CC_Minutes_2007_0813 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1 f °.~' HISTORY OF E MAILS ~ BETWEEN DAN ROE AND AL SANDS REGARDING THE NATURE OF THE TWIN LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUMMARY: Al Sands' position is that the City Council made scenario 1 the exclusive land use plan for Twin Lakes by Council Action on 6/26101. No other plans are effective. The only two plans under consideration at that time was scenario 1, and scenario la (big boz on parcels 6 & ~ 6/26/2001 Council Minutes: Mastel moved, Maschka seconded, by resolution, to approve the final amendment of the Comprehensive Plan for the Twin Lakes Business Park area from "Business" and "Industrial" to "Business Park" as described in the Twin Lakes Master Plan dated June 26, 2001 and as amended by Council with the Scenario #1. The amendment shall also included the findings of the AUAR and mitigation plan. Roll Call, Ayes: Goedeke, Mastel, %lausing, Maschka, and Kysylyczyn. Nays: none. (Italics added). If one follows the progress of the original comprehensive plan development, Map 3 was used to narrow the options down on January, 2001, with the final decision on scenario 1 coming on 6/26/01. Map 3 is not a part of the Council Packet on June 26,200E Because the Master Plan, scenario 1, was made a part of the Comprehensive Plan for Twin Lakes, it would take four votes to amend the plan (scenario 1). DaII RO@'S position follows now departed Development Director John Stark' position that Map 3 is still available as additional options. Mr. Roe does not think it necessary to amend the Comprehensive Plan to put in any number of different plans, but declines a position on the failed Rottlund plan. Note: The Court of Appeals Opinion is dated in August, 2006. Rottlund attempted another project that was pretty much in agreement with scenario one, ezcept they could not obtain necessary rights to put in the Twin Lakes Parkway from land owned and controlled by Roseville Properties, who was not a party to the revised plan. Rottlund abandoned the revised project in December 2006.