Laserfiche WebLink
1 W LL. 11V W L V V V Y Vlll Q Vll~' --Ul. 1 a.Ul 1 1VllVt+l 1 1 ~.JJ 1..U1LV11R1 L 11LLG1~' ~ J 1i11~ !r / <br />~ r <br />> the Twin Lakes Master Plan. as amended by Council minutes 6/26/01,?and in the <br />> comp plan, ?allows for a variety of mixed uses, based on including map 3 with <br />> the 3 additional options,? why did the Rottlund project get rejected by <br />> the?Appeals Court as not consistent with the?Twin Lakes Master Plan? <br />> And, then why?do the scenarios in the updated AUAR pass when the Rottlund Twin <br />> Lakes plan failed? <br />> Al Sands <br />> -----Original Message----- <br />> From: _.a ..- _~_~~ <br />> To c~~r. ~~~- -. <br />> Sent: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:08 pm <br />> Subject: Re: Howt o Govern a City --St. Paul Pioneer Press Editorial Friday, <br />> June 27 <br />> ? <br />> TWIN LAKES LANDOWNERS STATUS <br />> ???????? The following describes my understanding of the rights and <br />obligations <br />> of the present owners of property within the Twin Lakes Comprehensive plan <br />> area.? <br />> The Twin Lakes Comprehensive Plan designation is a P.U.D. with an underlying <br />B-6 <br />> Business Park District.?? A B-6 District may be established after completion <br />and <br />> city approval of a mixed use master plan? for that district and completion of <br />> environmental review.? This has been done. (Code Section 1005..07) <br />> Properties within the Twin Lakes area have various pre existing zoning that <br />> continue as? non conforming uses? under? Code Section 1011: <br />> Existing structures or uses may be? continued but may not be extended, <br />expanded, <br />> intensified, or changed, except to a conforming (B-6) use.? If property is <br />> damaged by casualty, the structures must be reconstructed within 6 months. If <br />> the non conforming use has been discontinued for twelve months, it shall not <br />> return to the? original or any other use which is non conforming. <br />> Normal maintenance is permitted. <br />> The appropriate action to initiate a land use change would be an application <br />for <br />> a planned unit development (Code Section 1005.07 (B) and 1005.08). <br />> To allow land owners within a development area to ignore the Comprehensive <br />Plan <br />> designation and operate only under the pre existing zoning would destroy the <br />> opportunity to control land use within the development area as a developer is <br />> sought and applies for? a planned unit development..? I suggest you talk to <br />> Thomas Paschke about this. <br />> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? NATURE OF THE TWIN <br />> LAKES MASTER PLAN <br />1 GL~V J Vl 44 <br />http://webmail.aol.com/29047/aol/en-us/Mail/PrintMessage.aspx 8/7/2007 <br />