Laserfiche WebLink
1 vv u. 11V VVL V VVVL.IU q vll~' --U L. / RL11 1 1V11VV1 11~.JJ litU W11GL1 1'llu[ly~ JlLL1G G/ <br />> now in Twin Lakes -- anything that meets current zoning, or anything that <br />> ultimately meets B6 (PUD).? They can make their decisions on that basis.? If <br />> they build an expensive new light industrial building, certainly they take a <br />> certain (known) risk based on the comp plan designation being other than <br />> industrial.? At the same time, anyone who wants to buy that property down the <br />> road and do a B6 development on it will have to fairly compensate the owner <br />for <br />> the value of the new building, based on the marketplace. <br />> ? <br />> By the way, it does not automatically require 4 votes to do everything in Twin <br />> Lakes.? As long as the comp plan does not need to be changed, a 3-2 vote will <br />> suffice.? It is not out of the realm of possibilities for a plan to come <br />forward <br />> that only Tom, Amy, and I support, for instance.? If it meets the comp plan <br />and <br />> you like the plan, too, would you say that it?is it bad to approve it by only <br />a <br />> 3-2 vote?? Of course, the preference would be to have 5-0 votes on <br />everything.? <br />> It comes down to how much each Councilmember is willing to compromise.? <br />> Ultimately,?I only control my 1 vote. <br />> ? <br />> Dan Roe <br />> Email dar,.roe@comcast.ne*_ <br />> ? <br />> ? <br />> ? <br />> ? <br />> -----Original Message----- <br />__., N., ..~~ ~ ~1 cam ._ __ .ar .,_ . . <br />> From. ~ , ~ ~ - [ , ~~ , ~ . - . - - 7 <br />> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 10:02 PM <br />> Subject: Re: Howt o Govern a City --St. Paul Pioneer Press Editorial Friday, <br />> June 27 <br />> ? If I had my druthers, I would not have voted for the Twin Lakes Master Plan <br />in <br />> June, 2001, as Klausing (and Kysylyczyn, and Maschka) did.? It is the type of <br />> central planning, on a very big scale that requires a developer with very deep <br />> pockets to implement <br />> that I would argue against.? And so does Mr. Greenhut.? But the Council did <br />vote <br />> it in and did incorporate it into the city's comprehensive plan, so it is the <br />> law of the land.? That the Council (and Klausing) in 2005 tried to ignore it <br />was <br />> a very costly mistake.? If this Council ignores it in approving the AUAR <br />update, <br />> you will be making an equally serious mistake.? Recognize and obey <br />> the?constrictions your predecessors have placed on you.? You don't really <br />> believe you?are above the law, do you? <br />rGlb'G O Vl LG <br />http://webmail.aol.com/29047/aoUen-us/Mail/PrintMessage.aspx 8/7/2007 <br />