Laserfiche WebLink
1 YY <L. 11V •• L V V V Y Vlll µ Vll' --V L. 1 6Lµ1 1 1V11V\rl 1 1 VJJ LY16VllLil 1 114(1'' ~ /IUlV Lr / <br />r <br />Are <br />> you ready for that?? By the way, I'm not ready to fire good employees and <br />> replace them with outsiders. <br />> Al Sands <br />> -----Original Message----- <br />> From: _ :.... .. <br />> Sent: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 3:08 pm <br />> Subject: Re: Howt o Govern a City --St. <br />> June 27 <br />> A1, <br />> ? <br />Paul Pioneer Press Editorial Friday, <br />> Here is a link to the original commentary from the Orange County Register.? <br />> ? <br />> ? <br />> I have to say that I read the piece in the PP on Friday, too, and came to a <br />> completely different conclusion about how Roseville compares to the objectives <br />> Mr. Greenhut sets forward.? Only if you buy into the notion that Roseville <br />city <br />> employees and officials?are self-centered, greedy, and corrupt could you <br />> conclude that most of Mr. Greenhut's complaints apply to Roseville city <br />> government.? <br />> 7 <br />> <br />> Interestingly, many of the notions that Mr. Greenhut espouses about freedom <br />from <br />> excessive control and creativity of land use are exactly what was being fought <br />> by opponents of Twin Lakes or by opponents of lot splits in Roseville.? I <br />wonder <br />> how those folks would respond to Mr. Greenhut's lassaiz-faire approach to <br />zoning <br />> controls? <br />> ? <br />> Regards, <br />> ? <br />> Dan Roe <br />> <br />> ? <br />> -------------- Original message -------------- <br />> From: _,> u=_ _ _ _._, <br />> The attached article appeared in the ST. Paul Pioneer Press last Friday.? I <br />> heartily agree with it's philosophy, opposite from the suffocating goals of <br />big <br />> time development this city embraces. <br />> You may wish to also read my comments on the Roseville Issues web site. <br />1 0.~~. 1 J V1 LL <br />http://webmail.aol.com/29047/aol/en-us/Mail/PrintMessage.aspx 8/7/2007 <br />