CC_Minutes_2007_0813 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

MAYOR KLAUSING'S GRAND DECEPTIONS August 13, 2007 By AI Sands Anxious to get the Twin Lakes LLC moving, Mayor Klausing's first grand plan, as I see it, had to do with trying to get azound the requirement of four votes required to approve the Twin Lakes LLC proposal. Armed with a flawed legal opinion from our city attorney declaring it unnecessary to get four votes to approve the Twin Lakes plan, Mayor Klausing gave the go ahead to the project. The Appeals Court Opinion brought this to a halt azound a yeaz and a half later, after millions in damages had been done to the land owners, the developers, and also to the city. The Court noted that the city cannot choose to ignore the fact that on 6/26/01, the city council MADE the Master Plan an integral part of the comprehensive plan by their motion and action. Mayor Klausing,. you were there throughout the development of the Twin Lakes Master Plan, from Jan. of 2001 until it's completion on 6/26/01. YOU were on that council and voted to approve that action. YOU know what it is. I see Mayor Klausing's second grand scam attempt going on now, when he adopted our now departed development director's attempt to reinvent the inherent nature of the Twin Lakes Master Plan by declaring that scenario 1-as voted in by the Council on 6/26/01-- was only one of many land use options available. Therefore many plans could be approved by the City Council without amending the current Twin Lakes Comprehensive Plan. Once again, Mayor Klausing ignores the directive of the Council in it's action on 6/26/01 making scenario # 1 the exclusive land use plan for Twin Lakes. That has become the basis for dreaming up three new AUAR (Alternative Urban Area-wide Review) scenarios, none of which conform to the real Twin Lakes Master Plan. Accordingly, this proposed AUAR is an inaccurate and fraudulent document. It incorrectly declazes the three scenarios it studies are consistent with the Twin Lakes Master Plan and Comprehensive Plan. NOT TRUE. Inaccurate documents approved as accurate and complete by a split council will not give future developers the assurance they need that they can move ahead with their development plans without fear of future legal complications.