pf_03674 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

,, _ ,. ~', .. _. -, ~. - - - e _ ~~ ~ -.$,~e City Dear IVIr, Beery: Case ~actsm The B~ m ~e ~Tas btzitt in 1952. The hou v , se :back:. sroximatety 37 feet from the front inc. The average in the area ~ _~s 37 fey 1 15 X81 stt. ft. or more with ap c _ - ate frontage of 94 feet or more. Lot coy%erage a _ 23% The tot is ret ~- ."" "_at and can accept drainage in the yard. The Beery renovation adds a second story : '- ~e ~ gill have over 3,000 s.f. within two stories. T'~e new parch addition wot d _:_. - ~ ° open front entry, new consistent roofing - ~ ~ ot~°~~ exterior materials. €n ade~__~v-- -- vutd he~~ a:_~~T=ate a drainage probte <<:, ti, e Pct basement watt of the ~~~ ~ .=_~ t1c_ __~~. The t-~:3~ ____' ~.~7ould bring tt~e front of the t_ _ ''- ithin 29,5 feet of the front property tine. Issues at ar~c~: l~eighbors were present at the hearing to understand the issues. No significant issues were expressed. Two neighbors found the plan to be acceptable. e~ela~uaeut I:_ ; .. > C~ ~ttee eca eudata; The Development Review Committee (DRC} ('ion IVlunson, Cathy Bennett, Thomas Pasehke, Dean Findell, and Dennis Welsch) recommended that there is a reasonable, livabte front porch solution. The proposal does meet more than eight of the applicabte twelve criteria for a setback permit as listed in Section 1013.05 of the City Code, and therefore the DRC recommended issuance of the Permit. The open porch must be setback 29.5 feet from the front property line. Gutters along the porch are required. Drainage must be directed to the street or on to 1