Laserfiche WebLink
>~113 <br />1~~-;: <br />1 <br />C . T17ursd _ , A . L _ - - _c -- r L _ velopment Review C ~d <br />a" , r~.: ~r~. ' ~pprov~ c pack pe__._t request _ _ _-_ <br />e `; _ ,..cl~a to i c ~ You ht <br />r r - ~- ~ <br />. ~~4. ' . <br />~ ..,.. , , _ . ~l ,, ~ - <br />11ac1~ '_, _ .~ _ .: ~ ~ : ; _ ... " et arm _ Y. <br />_ ~_ _ , <br />T` i': ~ 1 so~zth. Tl~e ~. ... ave an attached gara~_ <br />and ~~ a,' clrtlon wo€ ~ g . 1 e <br />new 7 ... r ~~<orprnate ~.t <br />tt,F Yf cl th4r fro' _ . <br />~jacent ne'~ ~'_ _,j-°-s were expressed. Three ~ '~ _ - <br />r -, <br />e _ e ~ ` _ ~~ ~ _ _e~ -o~. Tl~e Develapment Review <br />Cc~- ~e ~ `T' ° ~C ~' . ~ Vlnn, ~ , ~'ath}~ Bents e Jeff 11~Jenson, Dean Findell, and Dennis <br />-, _ ~ ~ .} recomme . t there is a reasonable, livable front porch solution. The <br />p ~posal does € ~t han eight of the applicable twelve criteria for cz setback permit <br />as listed in Sectio~~ 1 i3.~,5 of the City Code, and therefore the DRC recommended <br />issuance of the Perzzr~~. The porch must be setback 29 feet, 4 inches from the front <br />property line. Drainage must be directed to the street or on to the Spaulding property. The <br />neighborhood has varying styles and height. This project would. not add more height to <br />the site. ~lith the building permit application, the applicant has prepared a plan with <br />1 <br />