Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes <br />. Monday, September 24, 2007 <br />Page 16 of 24 <br />3. All tenants shall remove themselves from the premises within 60 days from the first day of posting of this Order revoking <br />the license as held by License Holder. <br />Q. Adopt Resolution No. 2007-191 being a resolution for rental housing license revocation at 4600 <br />Polk Street N.E. -Removed <br />Nawrocki stated that he was glad to see 4644 Washington was cleaned up. He stated that Circle <br />Terrace looked cleaner today, with only two TV's next to the street. There is progress on <br />community the clean up. <br />ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS <br />Report of the City Manager <br />• Activity Center -Council met with the ACAC last Monday night and discussed the summary <br />of their July Open House. There was a report submitted with the background and alternatives <br />that the committee will show at the third open house. The recommended rooms and sizes <br />were listed. These were downsized from the original size because the committee was made <br />aware of funding issues. At this point, the projected capital cost is about $14,457,000. Of <br />that, approximately $10,000,000 is construction costs. If the City approved funds that are set <br />aside are used, the amount financed would have to be $10,557,000. The average cost to a <br />$194,000 median valued house would be $107 per year. That same day we received the <br />study/report from the YMCA. They will meet with us on October 15 to discuss if they are <br />interested in participating with us. A preliminary look at the report indicates they would be <br />interested if a pool were included. If that is the case, their contribution would make a <br />difference. The third public hearing will be held sometime in November. <br />Nawrocki read a prepared statement regarding his personal opinion on any type of <br />community center. He stated that his comments did not reflect other Councilmembers <br />feelings. He referred to the YMCA study consideration, to consider working with the School <br />District, listed project cost estimates, indicated that a public referendum should be held, <br />questioned competition by facilities for residents, and indicated that we have had an activity <br />center in Murzyn Hall since 1938. <br />Newsletter <br />Nawrocki referred to last year's newsletter, stating that we need to improve the budget <br />information, being more factual than using a sales approach. If we talk about LGA losses, we <br />should talk about the increases we have had, including the HRA levy and County HRA levy <br />that was approved. He indicated the overall effect would be about a 10 percent increase. He <br />referred to the newspaper article indicating the cities not participating in the County HRA <br />levy. We need information in the newsletter about appliance pickup. Fehst stated that <br />information was in the last several newsletters. We also left information at resident's homes <br />to explain this. <br />Williams requested an explanation regarding when the State would have funded our <br />improvements. Fehst referred to the time period of local government revenue sharing called <br />Local Government Aid. He explained the advantage of that time was to'fund through General <br />Obligation Bonds when five-eights of very dollar were paid by the State. Had we done <br />projects then, such as road improvements, there would have been a substantial savings. <br />Nawrocki stated that information was not accurate. We were one of the better beneficiaries of <br />LGA, but thergwere limitations. We tried to maximize usage and receivecLSrtore from LGA <br />23 <br />