My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_1203
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_1203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2008 1:54:26 PM
Creation date
1/8/2008 1:54:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/3/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Truth-in-Tazation Hearing and Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, December 03, 2007 <br />Page 11 <br />Councilmember Pust opined that, when the properties came back, the tax <br />burden, or tax windfall, would be a lessening of the overall community tax <br />burden. <br />Mr. Miller concurred that the impacts would be minimal; and advised that <br />refined demonstrations would be available at the December 17, 2007 pub- <br />lic hearing; estimating that for an average home, the relief would be ap- <br />proximately $50/year taking all factors into consideration. <br />4) If we were to extend the decertification date and amend the TIF Plan, <br />funds can't be used to finance geothermal at skating center, since it's a <br />recreational facility; but it could potentially be used for sidewalk and <br />pathway infrastructure improvements, as a permitted use under the general <br />use of "installation of roads, utilities, sidewalks, and parking facilities." <br />Mr. Miller advised that dollars would have to be expended for such a use <br />in 2008 or 2009; that those dollars couldn't be captured and set aside, but <br />need to be expended, or they would revert. Mr. Miller advised that the <br />City Council would need to come to a collective agreement on the specific <br />use under those conditions. <br />Mr. Miller recommended, as the best course of action for the City Council to fol- <br />low if they adopted TIF Plan changes on December 17, 2007, would be to use <br />broad language, "as allowed under state statute," rather than being too precise on <br />the use, to allow sufficient latitude and opportunities in the future to designate <br />public purpose. <br />Further discussion included advantages and disadvantages for decertification or <br />extension; gains for the City, while considering the perspective of other taxing ju- <br />risdictions and negative impact to them; notice to those jurisdictions, as a courtesy <br />by staff, of pending action by the City; and market assumptions for commercial <br />properties, and anticipation of another $1.1 - $1.2 million annually by extending <br />the district unti12009. <br />b. Request by Ryan Companies for Contractual Relief in the Centre Pointe Re- <br />development Agreement <br />Finance Director Chris Miller presented a request from Ryan Companies for <br />Council consideration of possible relief of their Redevelopment Agreement for <br />Centre Pointe. Mr. Miller's written report dated November 8, 2007 provided de- <br />tailed options, impacts, ramifications, and related considerations for Council con- <br />sideration and discussion. Mr. Miller clarified that the City was under no obliga- <br />tion to provide relief to Ryan, based on advice of legal counsel. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.