2007-06-26_PWETC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Member Neprash said he didn’t think a recommendation on a negative declaration was appropriate for this Commission to make since residents wanting to request an EIW would take it to the City Council and not the PWETC. Member Vanderwall said he thought it would be irresponsible of the Commission not to make a recommendation on an issue because somebody might have an opinion they didn’t hear. Member Fischer said the question to ask yourself is if this plan has the potential for significant environmental effect. Chair DeBenedet said it was clear to him that the City Council has asked for comments and recommendations from the PWETC, and that’s what they should do. Member Fischer moved to recommend that Council issue a negative declaration. Member Vanderwall seconded. Ayes: 4 Nayes: 1 Motion carried 7.Pathway Master Plan Additional Information Member Vanderwall moved that this topic be discussed at the July meeting. Member Willenbring seconded. Ayes: 5 Nayes: 0 Motion carried 8.Welcome to Roseville Signs Discussion Duane Schwartz briefed the Commission on the history of this topic and posed certain questions: What criteria to use in deciding which groups get their logo on the sign; should the Roseville Visitor’s Association be involved (they’ve been discussing placing banners on streetlights in certain streetscape areas); where and how many signs should be placed; what type of sign should be used. Mr. Schwartz said staff would be prepared to discuss this further at the next meeting. The Roseville Visitor’s Association could also be invited for their input. Member Willenbring asked if the banners the Roseville Visitor’s Association was proposing would deteriorate. Mr. Schwartz said they would, and that should be part of the maintenance discussion. Member Willenbring said he would like signs similar to the current parks signs to make things more consistent, but different enough to be distinctive. Page 4 of 5