My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-10-23_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
2007-10-23_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 10:46:52 AM
Creation date
1/11/2008 8:12:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/23/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Schwartz updated the commission on the latest developments. There <br />has been some interest in different development proposals. Commission <br />members were asked for their input on design principles. <br /> <br /> Member Vanderwall said the design plan looked like it belonged in a more <br />urban area and that he hoped sidewalks and bike paths would be included <br />in the design. Chair DeBenedet agreed that sidewalks and bike paths <br />should be included. <br /> <br /> Member Vanderwall said as far as parking goes he thinks only parallel <br />parking would work in Roseville. Member Willenbring said that slant <br />parking might mean a parking ramp could be avoided. <br /> <br /> Member Vanderwall said he didn’t see anything regarding technology that <br />would be available for the development. Chair DeBenedet said that <br />maybe a spare conduit needed to be added into the design to avoid having <br />to rip up pavement in the future when someone needed different lines to <br />their building. Mr. Schwartz said that a plan for utility conduits had been <br />discussed with the previous developer. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schwartz said that Metro Transit has voiced interest in having a park <br />and ride facility at Twin Lakes. Member Vanderwall said a system should <br />be built to use the Roseville Circulator buses to bring people to the transit <br />hub and then on to other buses rather than building a big parking lot. <br /> <br /> Member Vanderwall moved to recommend additions to the design <br />document as follows: <br /> <br /> <br />1.Undergrounding utilities where feasible <br /> <br />2.Conduits for communications and technologies for future use <br /> <br />3.Enhanced transit facilities and opportunities <br /> <br />4.Parking in 10 vehicle units between islands <br /> <br />5.Illustrations should be viable scenarios <br /> <br />Member Willenbring seconded. <br /> <br /> Ayes: 3 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Abstained: 0 <br /> Motion carried <br /> <br /> <br />10.Agenda for next meeting – November 27, 2007 <br /> <br /> “Welcome to Roseville” Signs <br /> Rice Street Design <br /> Update on this month’s recommendations <br /> <br />11. Adjournment <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.