My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-09-25_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
2007-09-25_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 10:46:42 AM
Creation date
1/11/2008 8:12:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/25/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ayes: 4 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Abstained: 0 <br /> Motion carried <br /> <br /> <br />6.Cool Cities / Emissions Software Discussion <br /> <br /> Mr. Schwartz briefly explained how this software works and referred the <br />commission to previous packets for additional information. The City <br />Council has referred this topic to the commission for recommendations. <br />Mr. Schwartz said there has been some interest from Northwestern <br />College in getting students involved in service projects for the city; and <br />the high school originally brought this topic to the City Council, so there <br />might be some intern-type assistance available. <br /> <br /> Member Vanderwall moved to recommend that the City Council purchase <br />this software. Member Willenbring seconded. <br /> <br /> Member Vanderwall said this should not just be an internal tool. <br /> <br /> Member Neprash said they should definitely go back to the high school <br />class that initiated this. He also suggested sending out some kind of article <br />or newsletter, as telling the story is half the battle. <br /> <br /> Ayes: 4 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Abstained: 0 <br /> Motion carried <br /> <br /> <br />7.Welcome Signs Discussion <br /> <br /> Mr. Schwartz said that staff had researched the signage locations the <br />commission had proposed. All locations except Snelling at Roselawn are <br />feasible. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schwartz asked if the commission wanted to include the Roseville <br />Visitor’s Association banners as part of their recommendation. The <br />Roseville Visitor’s Bureau would be purchasing and storing the banners, <br />but they would expect the city to do the installation. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schwartz said he has been in contact with the company that made the <br />park signs but has been unable to get any cost information at this time. <br />Member Willenbring said they had to keep maintenance costs in mind as <br />well. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schwartz said the Council has been asked to submit additional budget <br />requests by October 15. Funding for signage is not currently in the City <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.