CC_Minutes_2008_0107 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, January 07, 2008 Page 6 Council Consensus was to relocate General Ordinances immediately following "Items Removed from Consent." Discussion included whether the "Report from the HRA" should be included as part of Agenda Item 4 (Council Communications, Reports, Announcements) or as a stand alone agenda item; whether the report would be a personal presentation or written report; and whether the City Council liaison would make the presentation. Councilmember Pust noted that the HRA wanted to ensure due diligence in re- porting to the City Council. Council consensus was to add the HRA Report as part of the Title of Agenda Item 4 (Council Communications, Reports, Announcements) to make sure it was con- sistently included on the agenda. Councilmember Kough sought clarification of the City's liquor license process, with Finance Director Miller responding. City Manager Malinen thanked Councilmember Roe for his assistance in crafting the tool, and referenced a matrix prepared and related to this topic, anticipating items to-date on the January 14, 2008 Council Agenda, and entitled, "City of Roseville -Future City Council Meeting Agenda -Tentative;" Mayor Klausing expressed strong interest in the designation of action and/or dis- cussion items, and opined that he would like that distinction built into the agenda to allow sufficient discussion on action items, while allowing time for presenta- tions aswell. Discussion included Items 12 and 13 in the order of business, respectively enti- tled, "City Manager Future Agenda Review," and Councilmember Initiated Fu- ture Agenda Items;" and whether they should be combined, or sepazated as indi- cated. Councilmember Ihlan expressed preference that the items remain sepazate at the end of each agenda. Further discussion included introduction of new items, the process, and practical application, with no clear consensus pending further review of notes of individual Councilmembers and future discussion. Councilmember Ihlan was not supportive of language that would limit introduc- tion of new items. After further discussion, and concerns that new items introduced be allowed the greatest amount of time for reseazch by staff, review and consideration by Coun-