Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville - HRA Minutes for August 15, 2006Page 4 of 5 <br />increment generated from the project be applied to payback the HRA for their funding. However, if all <br />the increment is needed for the new units proposed for the site, there is no guaranteeing that the <br />requested funding will be reimbursed. Mr. Casserly and CCHT continue to review financing options <br />including unit valuation and mix for the project. <br />Member Maschka requested clarification on the grant funds requested from the HRA. ($350,000 up <br />front for the renovation and $250,000 for the construction of new units in 2008). <br />Member Kelsey requested the need to review a sources and uses so that the HRA can see what <br />amount of renovation CCHT is proposing to put into the buildings and what sources of funding they <br />are using. She would like to see the capital costs outlined. She noted that the HRA can not <br />effectively do their evaluation without a sources and uses. <br />Member Maschka requested additional information regarding unit valuation which is a different <br />evaluation when comparing rental and for sale units. <br />Member Kelsey also requested to have the renovation of existing buildings split out from the <br />construction of the new units. Member Kelsey asked what is needed from the HRA in 2007? <br />($350,000). <br />Member Bean noted that if there is only $250,000 in available HRA funds to apply to the project <br />where would the additional funding come from? Bennett noted that the HRA could request additional <br />levy funds to cover that gap. <br />Mr. Casserly noted that it would be in the HRA’s best interest to design the financing so that the <br />HRA could recapture some of the up front financing. <br />Ms. Ciganik with CCHT provided a summary of the affordability. The project will include a mix of <br />affordable units meeting incomes between 30% - 80% of median incomes. She will provide a more <br />specific breakdown at the next meeting. <br />Update on City of Roseville Visioning Process <br />b. <br />Chair Majerus provided a brief update regarding the subcommittee work as part of the Vision 2025 <br />process. He noted that all the subcommittees have been meeting and will bring back issues and <br />recommendations to the Steering Committee later in the process. <br />Member Scheunemann noted that he submitted an application for two different groups and was not <br />contacted. Chair Majerus will follow-up on the status. <br />Member Kelsey mentioned that the recommendations coming from the subcommittee will definitely <br />have a budget impact for the City and the HRA. She wondered how the current budget process <br />should take that into consideration. <br />The HRA then returned to action item 8.b. regarding the HRA budget and levy request. <br />Board & Staff Reports <br />c. <br />None <br />10.Adjournment <br />The meeting was adjourned at 8:28 PM <br />Return to Housing & Redevelopment Authority <br />http://archive.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/hra/minutes/2006/hram081506.htm3/10/2008 <br /> <br />