pm_071205 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, December 05, 2007 Page 6 MOTION Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Doherty to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of a requested ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT to Section 1002 Definitions – Dog Kennel to exclude pet boarding and/or daycare as an accessory use to pet and pet supply store and Section 1005.015 Use Chart to include pet boarding and/or pet daycare as a conditional use in all zoning districts where pet and pet supply stores are permitted or conditional uses, for Rosedale Commons LP and PetSmart within Rosedale Commons shopping center, 2480 Fairview Avenue, based on the comments in Section 5 of the project report dated December 5, 2007. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Motion carried. MOTION Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Gasongo to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of an AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) for Rosedale Commons LP and PetSmart allowing pet boarding and a doggie day camp within Rosedale Commons shopping center, 2480 Fairview Avenue, based on the comments and findings of Section 6 and the conditions of Section 7 of the project report dated December 5, 2007; amended as follows: ? Condition A: language amended to read: “Pet boarding within PetHotel shall be limited to accommodations for 108 dogs [KENNELS] and 15 cats [KENNELS] within a 5,012 (+/-) square foot fully enclosed indoor facility;” ? Conditions B and C: pick-up/delivery of pets for boarding purposes: language amended to allow for drop-off for pet boarding, daycare and/or grooming (animal services) not before 7:00 a.m. AND hours of operation 9:00 a.m. – 9:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday; and 10:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. on Sunday; with drop off of pets allowed at 7:00 a.m. for boarding, grooming or day care purposes; with no pick-ups to occur after specifically-designated daily hours of operation; commensurate with the operation of the facility. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Chair Bakeman advised that the Case was scheduled to be heard by the City Council at their January 14, 2008 meeting. Chair Bakeman noted that the agenda had been amended to hear Project File 0011 at this time; 8:27 p.m. e. PROJECT FILE 0011 Consideration of revisions to the City Code that would clarify the text pertaining to cul-de-sacs and eliminate contradictory references Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Project File 0010. City Engineer Deb Bloom reviewed recent court action (October 8, 2007, Ramsey County District Court – Boryczka v. City of Roseville); and the court order and judge’ s ruling that the City had been incorrectly interpreting City Code, Section 1103.021D (Cul-de-sac Reductions). Ms. Bloom reviewed the history of staff interpretations that reduction in the right-of-way cul-de-sac dimensions could be approved if any of the three (3) criteria were met; and the judge opining that all three of the criteria must be met in order to allow sub-standard cul-de-sac. Ms. Bloom reviewed existing cul-de-sac inventories, their locations, and relevant code sections; with staff recommending, along with the City Attorney, that City Code language be revised to conform to previous City Council decisions by initial amendment to consolidate and clarify references to cul-de-sacs and turnarounds; based on Attachments A and B of the staff report. Discussion included process of staff’s preparation and presentation of feasibility reports for future construction projects; process for unusual circumstances for the cul-de-sac approval process previously