Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, Apri121, 2008 <br />Page 10 <br />1) the role of the HRA in proposed code enforcement implementation, indicated <br />as a later topic for discussion on tonight's meeting agenda; and <br />2) the need for strategic planning by the City in the area ofmulti-family housing; <br />with potential revenue bond issues; and what the Council considered as the <br />political feel of the HRA starting to consider such options. <br />Councilmember Pust noted that some HRA funds had been set aside for code en- <br />forcement tools; and questioned if the HRA would consider using some of those <br />monies for abatement, with later reimbursement through property assessments; or <br />use of those funds to hire temporary staff for the summer months for a pilot pro- <br />gram to assist with code enforcement, allowing staff to process citations during <br />the winter months. <br />Board Member Maschka opined that it was a good idea and that the abatement <br />process should be tested; however, was not supportive of funding for administra- <br />tive citations. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that she was not supportive of administrative cita- <br />tions at all; but supported being .upfront with residents by using the abatement <br />process, accomplishing the code enforcement as indicated, and assessing property <br />owners accordingly. <br />Discussion included the type of abatement, with a majority being trash pick up <br />and/or weeds; HRA monies set aside in the amount of $120,000; and where the <br />most could be accomplished, through abatement of trash removal or problem <br />houses. <br />Board Member Maschka opined that there should be social service, and a finan- <br />cial planning, components to code enforcement, particularly in homes where the <br />elderly were unable to maintain their homes anymore, or didn't know where to <br />start. Mr. Maschka opined that there should be a way to advise homeowners on <br />whether it was more economically feasible for them to remain in their home, <br />based on health and financial needs, or if it would be better to sell and move <br />elsewhere. Mr. Maschka recognized that this was a grey area for government, but <br />needed to be a component of code enforcement discussions. <br />Councilmember Pust cautioned that reviews needed to be as broad as possible, <br />without categorizing only elderly citizens in the context of code enforcement is- <br />sues. However, Councilmember Pust concurred with Mr. Maschka that there <br />needed to be more work done in standardizing social service resources for citi- <br />zens, whether faith, government or community-based agencies. <br />Councilmember Roe spoke in support of the HRA's role of educating the public <br />and getting out information to those needing assistance, whether through design <br />standard awareness or local loan programs for enhancement or code enforcement. <br />