My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2008_0428
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
CC_Minutes_2008_0428
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2008 2:04:04 PM
Creation date
6/13/2008 9:40:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/28/2008
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, April 28, 2008 <br />Page 10 <br />Lt. Rosand advised that it would be most helpful to the City's Police Department, <br />and the NCIC, if people would jot down their serial numbers to be entered into the <br />NCIC. <br />Councilmember Pust questioned what portion of stolen property reports included <br />serial numbers from those making the reports; sought clarification from Lt. Ros- <br />and on whether the 75 - 100 items confiscated represented just the City of Rose- <br />ville's Police Department or other law enforcement agencies; and the prosecution <br />rate based on the rate of confiscation. <br />Lt. Rosand responded that few people take time to note their serial numbers; ad- <br />vised that the total number of confiscated items represented a total for all agen- <br />cies; and that there was a 100% prosecution rate as all that needed to be proven <br />was that you were in possession of or receiving stolen property. <br />Councilmember Roe asked what regulatory provisions were in place for other <br />businesses receiving secondhand merchandise (i.e., Play It Again Sports). <br />Lt. Rosand responded that those types of businesses did present a problem for law <br />enforcement agencies, as they were not regulated the same as pawnshops, and of- <br />ten were dealing in stolen property unknown to them. Lt. Rosand opined that <br />Minneapolis and other communities had secondhand ordinances similar to those <br />for regulating pawnshops. <br />Mr. Smith advised that he was an advocate for the APS system, and those officers <br />managing the system; noting that he continued to testify for the subcommittee to <br />make this type of system a standard installation. Mr. Smith advised that the com- <br />puter and imaging system was very expensive; however, noted that the State of <br />MN was a model state for APS systems for other states. <br />Further discussion included discernable marks or identification beyond UPC <br />codes and serial numbers; cooperation between pawnshops and law enforcement <br />agencies; the good neighbor relationship of Pawn America, in addition to their <br />willingness to loan equipment to the Police Department and assist with appraisals. <br />Councilmember Roe asked Lt. Rosand if there had been any feedback from the <br />local retail community on Pawn America to-date; or if there had been any more <br />incidents of shoplifting trends or tracking since Pawn America began operating. <br />Lt. Rosand advised that he was unaware of any business in the immediate area of <br />Pawn America reporting a loss with a subsequent recovery at Pawn America; and <br />recalled no increase in shoplifting incidents or trends, opining that such an inci- <br />dent would certainly be something that would alert him. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.