Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, Apri128, 2008 <br />Page 7 <br />candidates, and ability of the public to provide their input, was open. Council- <br />member Roe spoke in opposition to appointing someone to the vacant seat who <br />intended to run for election to avoid providing extra publicity and/or advantages <br />to their campaign. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that the "kingmaker idea," indicating that whomever <br />was appointed would determine who won the fall election, was inaccurate and <br />further opined that incumbency didn't guarantee a win, and while it may be an <br />advantage, was an unknown. Councilmember Ihlan further opined that an ap- <br />pointed candidate may be voting on important issues and making a deciding vote, <br />while not having been democratically elected. Councilmember Ihlan further <br />opined that she was concerned that appointees maybe asked to promise not to run <br />for election, since that was their political right to do so. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that the implication of not being accountable to vot- <br />ers would also be applicable if someone only ran for office once, and didn't seek <br />re-election. Councilmember Pust further opined that they were still accountable <br />to the citizens of Roseville; and that there were lots of ways to be accountable <br />without standing for election. <br />Mayor Klausing thanked Councilmembers for the good discussion; and requested <br />that staff include future agenda discussion on revising City Ordinance related to <br />special elections. <br />12. a. Consider Adoption of a Resolution regarding the Request by Red Dog hold- <br />ings LLC d/b/a Cash N Pawn for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Pawn <br />Shop at 2181- 2195 Snelling Avenue (PF08-014) <br />Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon briefly reviewed the request, <br />and noted City Code Chapter 311 regulating pawnbrokers and precious metal <br />dealers, and reviewed recommended conditions of approval. <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted that inclusion in the staff report of over thirty-five communi- <br />cations and/or a-mails received by staff in opposition to, or expressing concerns, <br />with the proposed pawnshop. An additional written note of opposition was re- <br />ceived earlier today from Noreen Sarg, 1640 W Highway 36 and was presented as <br />a Bench Handout. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that the applicant had mailed a letter, dated April 21, 2008, <br />to residents in the immediate area, in an effort to address concerns of residents <br />about a pawnshop and to address misconceptions about the type of business. Mr. <br />Trudgeon advised that, consistent with public record and staff policy, a list of area <br />residents within a stipulated area, had been provided by staff to the applicant, at <br />their request. Mr. Trudgeon advised that the communication had been created and <br />distributed by the applicant, without review by staff beforehand, and thus any <br />concerns of the letter's content needed to be addressed directly to the applicant. <br />