Laserfiche WebLink
~~ \ <br />innnsota <br />DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION <br />Advisory Opinion 08-015 <br />This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, <br />section 13.072 (2007). It is based on the facts and information available to the Commissioner as <br />described below. All public data the Commissioner relied upon to issue this opinion are <br />available for public inspection and copying at the office of the Information Policy Analysis <br />Division (IPAD), unless the data have been disposed of in compliance with the state Records <br />Management Act. <br />Facts and Procedural History: <br />On May 16, 2008, IPAD received a letter, dated May I5, 2008, from John Kysylyczyn. In his <br />letter, Mr. Kysylyczyn asked the Commissioner to issue an advisory opinion whether the <br />members of the Roseville City Council (Council) had violated the Open Meeting Law, <br />Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, at a meeting held on February 11, 2008. In a letter to Mr. <br />Kysylyczyn dated May 19, 2008, IPAD requested additional information. The additional <br />information was received by IPAD on May 27, 2008. Mr. Kysylyczyn submitted the $200.00 fee <br />required by section 13.072. <br />On May 29, 2008, IPAD wrote to Mr. Craig Klausing, Chairman of the Council. In its letter, <br />IPAD informed Mr. Klausing of Mr. Kysylyczyn's request and gave the members of the Council <br />an opportunity to explain their position. The Council presented its position in a letter from its <br />attorney, Ann R. Goering, dated June 20, 2008. <br />A summary of the facts as presented is as follows. <br />The Council held a regular meeting on February 11, 2008. Agenda item 10 was a public hearing <br />to impose a penalty for violation of laws and ordinances related to the sale of alcoholic <br />beverages. The City of Roseville posts the documents provided to Council members before a <br />meeting on its website. Mr. Kysylyczyn had downloaded the documents for the February l 1, <br />2008, meeting and compared those documents to the ones available in the meeting room. The <br />materials were identical. One of the items in the packet was a recommendation to revoke the <br />license to sell alcoholic beverages due to the violation of the laws and ordinances by the license <br />holder. <br />During the course of the discussion of Agenda item 10, one Council member commented that the <br />recommended penalty was a 30-day suspension of the license and a $1,000 fine. After reviewing <br />a recording of the meeting at home twice, Mr. Kysylyczyn sent an email to the City Manager <br />asking if there were additional documents provided to Council members but not provided to the <br />public. <br />