My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2008_0811
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
CC_Minutes_2008_0811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 3:18:45 PM
Creation date
8/25/2008 3:18:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/11/2008
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 11, 2008 <br />Page 18 <br />taxpayers; and also requested a budget book showing more detailed breakdowns <br />by departments prior to discussion at the next meeting. <br />Councilmember Roe concurred with the request for more detailed breakdowns by <br />department; and also requested inclusion of the Ice Arena geothermal funding in <br />levy calculations for overall impacts. Councilmember Roe opined his preference <br />for review and adoption of the fee schedule at the same time as the budget adop- <br />tion to provide a true picture of the overall impact to taxpayers. <br />Councilmember Pust sought clarification on the projected wage and benefit in- <br />creases for 2009 and those contracts that have already been determined. Coun- <br />cilmember Pust questioned if the contract language included a provision to ad- <br />dress renegotiations when the State applied a cap on levy increases. Council- <br />member Pust sought an opinion from the City Attorney of legal ramifications to <br />the City if the contracts were opened for renegotiation; and suggested future con- <br />tracts provide for such renegotiation provisions in lieu of legislation limiting levy <br />increases. <br />City Manager Malinen advised that the City had three contracts, all of which had <br />been negotiated at 3.5% based on the average of cities determined in the subse- <br />quent year. <br />Mayor Klausing cautioned the Council as a whole in focusing on percentages, <br />noting the ranking of the City of Roseville with comparison cities, based on qual- <br />ity of life and services requested by its citizens. Mayor Klausing encouraged in- <br />dividual Councilmembers and citizens to bring forward specific proposals on <br />where to cut spending in the City Manager-recommended budget; and those spe- <br />cific programs that should be continued or eliminated. Mayor Klausing opined <br />that to go into structural imbalance with the City's reserves was not sound fiscal <br />policy. <br />Councilmember Ihlan requested additional information on specific public safety <br />exceptions and their relationship to the overall percentage of funds; those sup- <br />ported in the budget and those not. <br />Councilmember Pust requested more clarification on actual projections in the rec- <br />ommended budget for increased fuel and energy costs for 2009; as well as 3-4 <br />years back to determine trends overall and by department. <br />City Manager Malinen advised that staff was currently working on their recom- <br />mendations to identify and minimize fuel and energy costs. <br />14. City Manager Future Agenda Review <br />City Manager Malinen briefly reviewed upcoming agenda items, and provided copies of <br />those draft agendas to City Councilmembers and for the public. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.