Laserfiche WebLink
V~Y4~. c.N.. v. <br />1~~~~~ <br />Memo <br />To: Mayor and City Council <br />Bill Malinen, City Manager <br />From: Chris Miller, Finance Director <br />Date: March 17, 2008 <br />Re: Update on Estimated 2009 Property Values <br />Introduction <br />On Friday, March 14, 2008 City Staff received a packet of information from Ramsey County <br />which provided some insight on the City's estimated 2009 property values. Bear in mind that <br />these values represent the assessed market value for tax purposes. They do not necessarily <br />represent the price a property owner might receive if they went to market. <br />Based on this information: <br />• The 2009 median home value in Roseville is $237,400; up $4,400 or 1.9% from 2008 <br />• 49% of all homes had either no value increase or a decrease <br />• 33% of all homes had a value increase of 1-10% (most were on the lower end) <br />• 18% of all homes had a value increase in excess of 10% (most due to new construction) <br />• In the aggregate, residential values increased by approximately 0.3% <br />• In the aggregate, commercial/retail values increased by approximately 11.5% <br />Generally speaking, for 2009 Roseville's housing market is expected to maintain its value. <br />However, on an individual basis there are many homes that are expected to realize small <br />valuation declines. For 2009, commerciaUretail property valuations are expected to increase <br />substantially, reversing a recent trend. Commercial/retail property represents approximately <br />45% of the City's tax base and as a result of the valuation increases; it will offset the sluggish <br />growth in housing values. <br />Budget Impacts <br />Overall, in 2009 the City's tax base is expected to grow by approximately 4-5%. This is <br />primarily due to new construction and commercial valuation increases. This does not mean that <br />the City will collect 4-5% more taxes next year. The City gets what it levies for and nothing <br />more. The growth in the tax base simply means that the tax burden will be distributed <br />differently. For 2009, the property tax burden will shift slightly from residential to commercial. <br />In the event the Council determines that the 2009 maximum levy increase ought to be tied to the <br />growth in the tax base, the City could effectively increase the levy by approximately $500,000 or <br />4%, and keep the local tax rate the same. At that level, homeowners that experience no property <br />valuation increase would pay the same as they do now. <br />