Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 15, 2008 <br />Page 11 <br />Mr. Trudgeon continued to review the proposal before the City Council, noting <br />that there were currently four parcels which the applicant/developer proposes a <br />senior cooperative and an assisted living facility; and also requiring a public road <br />connection from Cleveland Avenue to Langton Lake Park, proposed along the <br />northern portion of the site, with the four parcels required to be platted (with two <br />lots proposed) and land dedicated for the road right-of--way. <br />Councilmember Roe requested staff to highlight Planning Commission discus- <br />sions regarding the ownership of the northwest corner wetland area, and rationale <br />for Commission and staff recommendation for that ownership. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that it was indicated that wetlands be under the City's <br />ownership, whether through an outlot or right-of--way. <br />Further discussion included dedicated right-of--way for Langton Lake Drive and <br />original inclusion in the Twin Lakes area transportation including a future road- <br />way from Mount Ridge right-of--way to the neighborhoods to the north and south <br />of the development parcel in relationship to practicalities with the wetland. <br />Councilmember Pust sought clarification on the proposed location and design of <br />the cul-de-sac. <br />Councilmember Ihlan sought clarification as to why the cul-de-sac appeared to <br />extend into park land; why there was a road to begin with; and if previously <br />planned to lead into the park, why there had not been more planning to preserve <br />more of the wooded area. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that those issues were more appropriate for more in-depth <br />discussion as they related to the upcoming case, noting that there were two op- <br />tions available: to locate a cul-de-sac on the developer's property on a temporary <br />basis (potentially for multiple years), without significant right-of--way available to <br />accommodate it; or to have a turnaround on park property; and recommended ad- <br />ditional discussion as indicated by the staff report related to that case, and based <br />on other future developments and preferred connections. <br />Roe moved, Willmus seconded, approval of the PRELIMINARY PLAT for 2990, <br />2996, 3008 and 3010 Cleveland Avenue, allowing for the creation of two lots and <br />land for dedication of right-of--way, based on the comments in Section 4 and 5, <br />and the conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated September 15, 2008. <br />Councilmember Pust clarified that this motion would only serve to approve layout <br />of lots, and not specific dedication of right-of--way based on proposed road loca- <br />tion. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed her concern regarding application of the Twin <br />Lakes AUAR regarding previous discussion of the senior cooperative and the past <br />