Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, October 13, 2008 <br />Page 8 <br />Councilmember Ihlan further addressed the proposed timeframe for adoption by <br />the City Council, following the proposed December 15, 2008 Public Hearing; <br />opining that if that were to happen, it would be prior to having a new City Council <br />elected and in place. Councilmember Ihlan noted that there had been substantial <br />discussion at the time of the City Council appointment of Councilmember Will- <br />mus, and assumptions that approval of the Comprehensive Plan Update would not <br />occur before 2009, and not while anon-elected City Councilmember could poten- <br />tial cast a deciding vote. Councilmember Ihlan opined that, if the City were to re- <br />quest anextension at this time, it would take decision-making off the table and al- <br />leviate another concern in approval prior to the 2009 City Council being in place. <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that there were a number of people in the audience <br />tonight that wished to be heard; and asked that the City Council allow time for <br />their comment. <br />Mayor Klausing noted those in the audience, and advised that it was his intent, as <br />had been past practice, to hear public comment tonight. Mayor Klausing noted <br />that many had also provided their comment at previous opportunities for public <br />comment, at the Open Houses, Steering Committee meetings, and at the Planning <br />Commission's formal Public Hearing. Mayor Klausing suggested that Council- <br />member Ihlan's concerns in passing the draft on for distribution with a 3-2 vote <br />may prove premature until a motion was on the table and a vote taken. Mayor <br />Klausing noted that he had also received numerous calls and e-mails, almost ex- <br />clusively related to the anonymous flyer distributed in the HarMar neighborhood; <br />and opined that the flyer, a copy of which had just been provided to him by City <br />Manager Malinen, appeared to contain substantial misinformation; however, he <br />advised that he would reserve judgment until he'd read it more thoroughly. <br />Councilmember Willmus addressed the accountability question brought forth by <br />Councilmember Ihlan. Councilmember Willmus advised that to-date, he'd had <br />contact with approximately 26 citizens, and that he had responded to each one; <br />with a number seeking follow-up with him after his initial reply to them. Coun- <br />cilmember Willmus advised that the majority of his conversations and public con- <br />cerns pertained to the HarMar site; and he noted that, citizens became more posi- <br />tive when they understood the actual size of HarMar and proposed language of <br />the Comprehensive Plan and the Community Business land use definition. Coun- <br />cilmember Willmus noted that, upon citizen review of the flyer and its rather in- <br />flammatory statement, "Do we want another major mall in Roseville?" that it had <br />precipitated a lot of citizen contact. Councilmember Willmus opined that, once <br />people had a chance to understand the process, they appeared to feel better about <br />the draft Plan. <br />Councilmember Willmus took personal exception to being accountable; and <br />opined that his situation was no different that that of Councilmember Ihlan in <br />2004 when she was initially appointed to the City Council, prior to her subsequent <br />