CC_Minutes_2008_0609 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, June 9, 2008 • Page 10 Councilmember Roe concurred with the comments of Councilmember Pust, not- ing that it was apparent that several departments had forms of their strategic plan in place, and those stood out in the presentation and didn't quite match the stan- dardized formation or verbal presentation on May 19, 2008. Councilmember Roe suggested that staff work on the consistency across departments as a way to syn- thesize information and get it more concise. Councilmember Ihlan thanked City Manager Malinen and staff for undertaking this strategic plan; opining that it was a good first step, and that she'd found the presentations further enlightening. Public Comment Al Sands, 2612 Aldine Mr. Sands opined that it was good to see five Councilmembers back on the bench. Related to the strategic plan, Mr. Sands opined that he appreciated the Council comments; and further encouraged the City Council to go slow and get it right. Roll Call Ayes: Willmus; Ihlan; Pust; Roe and Klausing. Nays: None. 13. a. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Finance Director Chris Miller advised that the CIP included in tonight's packet was a draft prepared in accordance with the goals and strategies identified in the Imagine Roseville 2025 initiative and those identified by the City Council earlier this year. Mr. Miller noted that a full and more detailed CIP would be presented to the Council at their June 30, 2008 meeting. Mr. Miller reviewed the antici- pated need over the next 10 years to replace existing vehicles, equipment and in- frastructure, and allow purchase of new assets to enhance the City's programs and services in an amount estimated at $100 million. Mr. Miller also noted the antici- pated funding gap that would allow approximately $30 million to facilitate those needs and requiring priority challenges, and identifying new funding sources that wouldn't directly impact property taxes. Councilmember Ihlan requested additional analysis by staff prior to the June 30, 2008 discussion on the impacts to the CIP in light of new legislative levy impacts over the next three years .limited to 3.9%. Councilmember Roe questioned if this CIP included normal Pavement Manage- ment Plan (PMP) costs or indicated new construction only; with Mr. Miller re- sponding that a vast majority of the CIP was replacement of existing infrastruc- ture costs. Councilmember Roe noted that a new fire station did not exist and that there may be other mitigating factors or other funding sources that could be iden- tified. •