Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, March 05, 2008 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />Staff recommended APPROVAL of the request for a VACATION of that portion of the Walnut <br />Street right-of-way that overlapped the southwest corner of the Midland Hills Golf Course <br />property, based on the comments and findings outlined in Section 5, and the conditions detailed <br />in Section 6 of the Project Report dated March 5, 2008. <br />Commissioner Boerigter questioned why staff was not recommending vacation of the entire right- <br />of-way. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that, in conversations with MnDOT and the City of Lauderdale, the City had a <br />sanitary sewer force main in the triangular-shaped parcel owned by the City, and with potential <br />need for expansion of that in the future, and possible widening of Highway 280 in the future, staff <br />wanted to preserve that portion of the public right-of-way for those possible events and to provide <br />sufficient room for water retention ponds if needed. Ms. Bloom noted that the City of Roseville <br />didn’t use the Walnut Street connection, only the City of Lauderdale. <br />Ms. Bloom also noted that it was MnDOT’s intent to add a noise wall later this year, and that this <br />Walnut Avenue connection to Highway 280 was temporarily closed with rerouting caused by the I- <br />35W bridge collapse in August of 2007, and was intended for permanent closure in 2009. Ms. <br />Bloom noted that this was additional rationale for staff making the recommendation for vacation, <br />based on other needs in the corridor. Ms. Bloom further advised that, it was staff’s intent to <br />encourage the Golf Course to move the fence so it was consistent with property lines. Ms. Bloom <br />clarified right-of-way dedications that are owned by the property owner, with dedication of right-of- <br />way required by the City in some cases for public purposes; and when the City deemed the <br />property was no longer needed, the property owner could ask that the dedicated easement be <br />released. Ms. Bloom noted that the City didn’t own the property, but just the rights for specific <br />public purposes as needed. <br />The applicant was present, but concurred with staff and had no comment. <br />Chair Bakeman closed the Public Hearing, with no one speaking for or against. <br />MOTION <br />Member Wozniak moved, seconded by Member Boerigter to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of <br />a RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION for Midland Hills Country Club, 2001 Fulham Street, based on <br />the comments and findings of Section 5, and conditions detailed in Section 6 of the <br />Project Report dated March 5, 2008. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Chair Bakeman advised that the Case was scheduled to be heard by the City Council at their <br />March 24, 2008 meeting. <br />d. PLANNING FILE 08-008 <br />Request by Michael Schueller, in conjunction with property owners Catherine and Riaz <br />Hussain, for approval of an INTERIM USE PERMIT to allow a deli and catering facility at <br />1901 Lexington Avenue <br />Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 08-008. <br />Mr. Lloyd reviewed the request of Michael Schueller for an INTERIM USE PERMIT to allow a deli <br />and catering facility in the existing building at 1901 Lexington Avenue, in accordance with <br />Roseville City Code, Section 1012.09 (Interim Uses). <br />Mr. Lloyd reviewed previous Planning Commission action for approval of a rezoning request for <br />the property; and ultimate City Council denial of the rezoning, tabling the item and encouraging <br />the applicant to withdraw that application and work with staff to devise another way of permitting <br />the desired uses on the property without opening it up to other traffic-intensive uses allowed in a <br />B-1B District in the future. Mr. Lloyd noted that the City Council identified a zoning text <br />amendment of PUD as desired applications for uses that they could possible support, with staff <br />ultimately reviewing those options with the City Attorney, determining that neither would be <br />appropriate for the current purposes. Mr. Lloyd advised that an IUP application seemed the most <br /> <br />