Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, March 05, 2008 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Dede Goodwin, 2206 Haddington Road (south/west of parcel) <br />Ms. Goodwin spoke in support of rehabilitation of the five (5) existing buildings; however, was not <br />supportive of adding a new building, and echoed concerns about the proposed access to the new <br />building expressed by the previous speaker. <br />Ms. Goodwin provided extensive demographic information she’d researched with the City’s Police <br />Department on crime statistics and comparisons between 2006 and 2007, alleging that the <br />increase was due to the Har Mar Apartments. Ms. Goodwin made comparisons between the Har <br />Mar Apartments and Rosewood Village crime statistics, and expressed grave concern regarding <br />the existing and ongoing major crime in that small geographic section Roseville. Ms. Goodwin <br />calculated that at Rosewood Village there was one police call for every nine people in 2007 <br />compared to Har Mar Apartments showing police calls almost four (4) times that many, with only <br />half as many tenants, and with on-site management. <br />Ms. Goodwin opined that by increasing the population and density of that population in this 4-5 <br />block area, it would substantially increase the crime rate. Ms. Goodwin questioned if there was a <br />screening process right now for tenants, specifically when talking about affordable housing; and <br />recognized that Roseville was changing from an inner-ring to urban suburb, with increased <br />density and diversity. <br />Commissioner Gasongo asked Ms. Goodwin if she thought not building a new building would <br />reduce crimes in the area; and sought specific suggestions for how to alleviate the crime <br />situation. Commissioner Gasongo noted the increase in crime from 2006 to 2007 occurred <br />without the proposed new building. <br />Ms. Goodwin opined that, with subsidized transitional housing in such a small geographic area <br />representing approximately 4% of the overall City, increased crime was a probability. Ms. <br />Goodwin further opined that a good preventative measure would be to not increase the <br />population in the area. <br />Chair Bakeman opined that land use didn’t generate increased crime; and while Ms. Goodwin <br />had some valid points related to density and crime statistics, the solution was not an easy one nor <br />all-inclusive. <br />Kate McGough <br />Ms. McGough responded to Ms. Goodwin’s concerns, expressing appreciation for neighborhood <br />concerns related to density and crime statistics. Ms. McGough clarified that when their firm took <br />over the building, it was in great disrepair with many vacant units, and they had attempted to <br />repair as much as possible. Ms. McGough noted that the population of the units had doubled, in <br />addition to the crime statistics. Ms. McGough advised that the other side of that scenario may be <br />that there is now a property manager on-site who was strongly encouraged, along with residents, <br />to call the Police Department when they see anything amiss or suspicious actions on the <br />property, in an effort to foster a sense of community and responsibility. Ms. McGough, therefore, <br />noted that the increased calls were not a surprise, and may prove more positive and beneficial to <br />the community than evidenced by Ms. Goodwin’s perceptions. <br />Ms. McGough advised that, while she couldn’t make any guarantees on future crime statistics, all <br />their new residents went through criminal background checks; and that they were seeking tenants <br />who were going to interact well with current residents, so people would feel safe in their own <br />homes. Ms. McGough committed to continuing to reduce crime in the facility and neighborhood <br />to the best of their ability. <br />Ms. McGough addressed the proposed location of the driveway in the concept plans, and <br />expressed willingness to continue working with staff on the site plan to mitigate placement of the <br />driveway. <br />Ms. McGough addressed the proposed height of the new building in Phase II, noting that it was <br />six feet (6’) taller than existing buildings, and while not anticipating that it would have a huge <br />impact on current or adjacent structures, recognized neighborhood concerns, and expressed <br />willingness to continue to work with staff accordingly. <br /> <br />