My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_050708
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
pm_050708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2008 2:43:41 PM
Creation date
11/17/2008 2:43:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/7/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, May 07, 2008 <br />Page 8 <br />great destination point, that he predicted would become even more attractive in the <br />future, and the interest in attracting a commercial investment that would be compatible <br />with the library, and create a greater community investment in that specific area. <br />Commissioner Boerigter noted a specific node at Dale Street and County Road B by Villa <br />Park, abutting the B-Dale Club and mortuary, with an island of single-family homes <br />surrounded by a park, commercial parcels or the B-Dale Club, with high density housing <br />across the street from the park; and questioned whether that area should be designated <br />other than single-family. <br />Mr. Fifield recognized this observation, providing for further discussion at the Steering <br />Committee level, in addition to additional discussion of single-family uses to the north and <br />adjacent to Highway 36. Mr. Fifield opined that discussion would include whether the <br />housing stock was sound, or if in transition. <br />Mr. Fifield further addressed the discussions at the Steering Committee level regarding <br />the nodes at Lexington and Larpenteur Avenues, the community level shopping areas, <br />and transitioning into residential, and the preference to not allow commercial to continue <br />to creep up Lexington Avenue, necessitating the balance between Shopping Center and <br />Commercial zoning activity between now and 2030 in order to reinforce the investments <br />made to-date. <br />Mr. Fifield addressed the Hamline Shopping Center and several alternatives, including <br />the current guide for Shopping Center under the existing Comprehensive Plan, and <br />whether it may be more viable for commercial or mixed commercial and residential, with <br />intense redevelopment anticipated between now and 2030, and promotion of a <br />continuation and expansion of high density housing, with redevelopment of retail or <br />commercial (office) neighborhood uses. <br />Further discussion ensued related to additional places in the City for higher density <br />residential than previous land use designations (i.e., Reiling property on Lexington across <br />from City Hall; along Twin Lakes west of County Road C), including industrial areas <br />existing east of Snelling Avenue on the south side of the rail road tracks with limited <br />access creating incompatibility for long-term industrial use, but good for single-family <br />neighborhoods or a better use for higher density residential; impacts of additional transit <br />coming into the NE Diagonal; existing Owasso School site at County Road C and Victoria <br />Street, currently designated institutional, but gearing toward a higher density residential; <br />and other transit corridors, park and ride facilities and/or rapid transit bus terminals. <br />Mr. Fifield thanked commissioners for their input and considerations; and encouraged <br />commissioners to provide any additional thoughts between now and the next <br />presentation to staff to be forwarded to the consultants and Steering Committee for <br />further review. Mr. Fifield opined that the ultimate Comprehensive Plan Update may not <br />be the ultimate choice of each one, but would hopefully represent a great compromise <br />plan for the City of Roseville as a whole. <br />Mr. Fifield advised that as the preliminary traffic consultant work was reviewed over the <br />next few weeks, incorporating Metropolitan Transit and Metropolitan Council plans, that <br />additional information would be available on those Central Corridor and express transit <br />routes most likely to be built and those impacting Roseville in the future. <br />Commissioner Gottfried opined that local politics could greatly impact the development of <br />the Central Corridor and extend the process; however, further opined that it was more <br />important to plan flexibilities for bus routing over the next 3 – 5 years. <br />Mr. Fifield expressed the many amenities of the Roseville community, specifically its <br />premier location in the Twin Cities, creating a host of opportunities; while also creating a <br />need to balance what plan serves the City of Roseville and what captures opportunities <br />for other things to happen locally and regionally. <br />Commissioner Wozniak opined the need to incorporate more low-tech pedestrian and <br />bicycle pathway opportunities. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.