Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 24, 2008 <br />Page 13 <br />Mayor Klausing noted the age of the employee, and questioned City Attorney <br />Squires as to the City Council's ability to limit the age for servers of alcohol. <br />City Attorney Squires advised that the City Council could amend their ordinance <br />to more stringently restrict the age of servers of alcohol. <br />Councilmember Pust concurred with Councilmember Roe's comments on the <br />need to amend the ordinance to encourage compliance while also being cognizant <br />of the realities of running a hospitality business. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Pust; Willmus; Roe; Ihlan; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that Fuddruckers had ten (10) days for appeal of this ac- <br />tion. <br />d. Consider Legal Services Contract for City Prosecutor and City Attorney <br />City Manager Malinen reviewed the additional detail on the panel ranking, ration- <br />ale, and recommendation of the incumbent legal firms for prosecutorial and civil <br />legal services to the City of Roseville, as outlined in the staff report dated No- <br />vember 20, 2008; and his ultimate recommendation. City Manager Malinen re- <br />spectfully requested City Council ratification of his recommendation for appoint- <br />ment as indicated. City Manager Malinen indicated that he anticipated additional <br />cost savings with both firms, beyond the proposed budget projections for 2009. <br />Discussion included staff's rationale for not contacting references for other appli- <br />cants and verification of their responses; with City Manager Malinen advising that <br />he had not taken that additional step, opining that it was not necessary since his <br />recommendation was not for consideration of one of those other firms; and that <br />staff was familiar with the incumbents' records and response times. <br />Further discussion included attorney time working with the City Council and the <br />majority of hours spent working with staff on various issues on a daily basis; ex- <br />perience of the firms making application; consent from applicant firms to make <br />their proposals public for discussion at tonight's meeting; the track record of in- <br />cumbents in working with the City; and future consideration of a formal struc- <br />tured evaluation for legal counsel. <br />Additional discussion included contract amounts paid in 2008; projected 2009 <br />contractual fees; and actual proposed fees budgeted against non-retainer items. <br />Further discussion included roll over of reserves into General Fund reserves; and <br />clarification that the City Manager is asking the City Council for ratification of <br />