My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_0207S
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_0207S
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2009 12:42:49 PM
Creation date
3/3/2009 12:42:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/7/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special City Council Strategic Planning Meeting <br />Saturday, February 7, 2009 <br />Page 20 <br />Parks & Recreation Director Brokke asked that Councilmembers provide direction to <br />staff to move forward with reductions or adjustments; but that the current situation in <br />limbo not continue, based on upcoming seasonal issues and programming; and staff's <br />intent to review everything for long-term impacts. Mr. Brokke opined that the City's <br />Parks and Recreation Commission served as a voice in the community and represented <br />citizens well. <br />City Manager Malinen reiterated that this is an opportunity for the City Council to make <br />a decision: whether they wished to use any reserves; or whether cost-saving measures <br />should be spread to departments as indicated and prorated accordingly. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of a combination of the two options. <br />Councilmember Roe concurred to a combination of the two options for the 2009 budget <br />year. <br />Councilmember Pust recognized the need that a decision was needed now; however, she <br />noted that the City Council had just been introduced to a myriad of other concepts and <br />possibilities, but that revenue producing options had not been provided. Councilmember <br />Pust opined that, if it came down to it, and there were no other options, she would support <br />the use of some reserves; however, if she could find another way to achieve that result <br />without using any reserves, that would be her preference. <br />Mayor Klausing concurred. <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted the need for formal City Council action. <br />Councilmember Roe noted that any action would require an amendment to the City <br />budget; however, he opined that, regarding staffing decisions, the City Council would <br />need to address them as they came forward; and that a small use of reserve funds maybe <br />needed in those particular cases. Councilmember Roe opined that, while some decisions <br />may be more time-sensitive, there may be others that could be postponed or delayed. <br />However, Councilmember Roe noted that the City Council would need to come to a <br />decision-making point and provide direction to staff based on the available options, <br />reserves, and/or potential revenue sources. <br />Councilmember Johnson spoke in support, on a one-year basis, for limited use of <br />reserves, following additional discussion on specific and overall impacts. <br />City Manager Malinen admitted that he had come to the City unaware of the volatility of <br />both LGA and MVHS; and advised in the future, as the City restructured its budget <br />process, he would recommend that it be utilized, when realized, as part of the City's <br />capital outlay program, but not depended on for the structural budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.