My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_0323
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_0323
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2009 1:22:13 PM
Creation date
4/2/2009 1:22:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting 8s Executive Session <br />Monday, March 23, 2009 <br />Page 20 <br />City Attorney Anderson noted that discussion of this issue had been held in <br />Closed Executive Session and that this motion authorized offers as discussed for <br />those specific properties. <br />Pust moved, Johnson seconded, authorizing staff to proceed, as discussed and at <br />the amounts discussed in Closed Executive Session, for acquisition of portions of <br />property located at 2690, 2700, 2770 - 2800, at 2814 Cleveland Avenue; 1947 <br />County Road C; and 2680 - 2690 Prior Avenue; excluding 2785 Fairview <br />Avenue, for Road and Construction Purposes. <br />Councilmember Ihlan advised that she was supportive of the motion for the <br />properties, with the exception of 2785 Fairview Avenue; opining that acquisition <br />of that parcel would be expensive, unnecessary and wasteful and would not be in <br />the public's best interest. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Pust; Ihlan; Johnson; Roe; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />Mayor Klausing was preparing to adjourn the meeting at 10:02 p.m.; but allowed <br />a resident to speak to the matter. <br />Dick Houck, 1131 Roselawn <br />Mr. Houck opined that this was an inappropriate action at an inappropriate time, <br />when taxpayers were losing their retirement incomes, jobs, and experiencing other <br />financial difficulties in this economic situation. Mr. Houck opined that there was <br />no purpose for this road construction without any developer interest at this time. <br />Mr. Houck expressed his strong opposition to this action of the City Council. <br />Councilmembers discussed the total cost of the construction for Phase I of this <br />project; utilization of a DEED grant and TIF funds; including a portion <br />reimbursed by Metropolitan Transit to facilitate the Park and Ride facility. <br />13. Business Items - Presentations/Discussions <br />14. Councilmember-Initiated Items for Future Meetings <br />16. Adjourn <br />The meeting was adjourned at 10:06 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.