My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_0223
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_0223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2009 1:53:11 PM
Creation date
4/2/2009 1:53:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, February 23, 2009 <br />Page 22 <br />and/or discipline issues; and those would be the only practical things requiring a <br />standard disclaimer. <br />Councilmember Roe concurred that this statement was overused. Councilmember <br />Roe referred to a recent presentation at Roseville University related to City Policy <br />development on Data Practices and Record Retention that may serve to help clar- <br />ify the questions and concerns expressed by Councilmember Pust. <br />Councilmember Roe noted the need to clarify language on Page 2, lines 8 - 13, <br />related to distribution to all City Councilmembers or only a quorum. <br />City Attorney Anderson noted that this language was word for word from the <br />Open Meeting Law. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that this policy was designed to distinguish communica- <br />tion, not pending City Council action, going to all Councilmembers. <br />City Attorney Anderson clarified the need to remind staff that anything specific to <br />an agenda item needed to be included in the agenda packet and provided to the <br />public, unless falling within City Attorney/client privilege. City Attorney Ander- <br />son further clarified that, if a member of the public sent each Councilmember <br />communication, there was no requirement in law to provide a public copy of those <br />member materials; only those items prepared and/or distributed at the direction of <br />the governing body or its employees; but that something coming to the City <br />Council from a citizen was not within the provision of law needing to be included <br />in the packet materials. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that, beyond the statute, but from a policy standpoint to <br />provide for transparency in government and in the spirit of the law, it may be pru- <br />dent to include that information. <br />City Attorney Anderson noted that there was nothing prohibiting the City Council <br />from going further than the law required if they so chose that as their policy. <br />City Attorney Anderson advised that he would take tonight's comments and dis- <br />cussion into consideration for changing this first draft, as well as further research- <br />ing First Amendment laws. <br />14. City Manager Future Agenda Review <br />City Manager Malinen reviewed upcoming meeting agendas and distributed drafts to <br />Councilmembers via bench handout. <br />Councilmembers discussed additional time for advisory commission interviews, in addi- <br />tion to a brief Executive Session scheduled on March 9, 2009. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.