Laserfiche WebLink
Senator Senate <br />John Marty <br />State of Minnesota <br />February 23, 2009 <br />Mayor Klausing and Roseville City Council <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br />RE: New Utility Billing Formula <br />Dear Mayor Klausing and City Council Members: <br />A recent letter to Roseville residents included with water bills mentions a state <br />environmental law requiring municipalities across Minnesota to promote water <br />conservation through rate structure and uses this law as justification for the new rate <br />structure chosen by the city. However, the change in rates move the city further away <br />from aconservation-based system than the old rates, in direct violation of the law's <br />intent. In effect, the cost increases fall disproportionately on the shoulders of <br />residential customers who conserve while wasteful consumers and larger commercial <br />customers may actually see their bills decrease. <br />The intent of Minnesota's new water conservation law is to protect our one of our <br />most precious natural resources by increasing costs as usage goes up. The <br />Department of Natural Resources says that is achieved by creating a billing system <br />with multi-tiered rates with a 25% to 50% rate difference between each tier. In this <br />area, Roseville's new structure fails on all accounts: 1. there are only two billing <br />levels, 2. commercial customers are excluded from usage-based rates, and 3. the <br />difference between the two tiers is nominal. <br />Furthermore, small-volume consumers see only a nominal savings if they are in the <br />lowest category because a disproportional amount of their bill is a flat fee, subverting <br />the financial incentive to save water. In this case, the large fixed-rate makes small- <br />users pay far more per 1000 gallons used than larger customers (please see attached <br />chart). Under the new rate structure a residential customer in Roseville using 5000 <br />gallons pays $7.40 per 1000 gallons of water. In contrast, a customer using 50,000 <br />gallons pays only $2.55 per gallon. This directly violates the intent of the state law. <br />As you can see in the attached chart, customers that use more than 50,000 gallons or <br />more per billing period will actually see their-bills decrease under the new system. <br />This is because the majority of the increases were applied to the flat rate instead of <br />the usage-based rate. <br />State Capitol, St. Paul, MN 55155-1606 (651) 296-5645 jmarty@senate.mn <br />