Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment A <br />PLANNING FILE 09-003 <br />Request by Wellington Management for approval of a REZONING of 1126 Sandhurst and 1267 <br />Lexington Avenue to Planned Unit Development (PUD) from Single-Family Residence District and <br />General Business District, respectively; and GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT <br />DEVELOPMENT (PUD) to allow the construction of a multi-tenant commercial office property. <br />Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 09-003 (6:44 p.m.). <br />Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd reviewed staff's analysis of the request of Wellington Management for <br />approval of a REZONING of 1126 Sandhurst and 1267 Lexington Avenue to Planned Unit Development <br />(PUD) from Single-Family Residence District and General Business District, respectively; and GENERAL <br />CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), which would replace the existing TCF bank <br />structures at 2167 Lexington Avenue and the adjacent single-family residence at 1126 Sandhurst Drive to <br />allow the construction of a multi-tenant commercial office property and redevelopment of the northwest <br />quadrant of the intersection of County Road B and Lexington Avenue with an 11,250 square-foot <br />commercial office building and parking area. <br />Mr. Lloyd reviewed detailed information from the staff report dated March 4, 2009, and specifically <br />addressed Section 5.3 related to deviations from standard setback requirements due to the proposed <br />location of the building near the corner of County Road B and Lexington Avenue, noted in the flexibility of <br />PUD applications. Mr. Lloyd noted that such flexibility would ultimately need approval by the City Council <br />and must be demonstrably consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Staff recommended approval of the REZONING, based on the comments and findings outlined in <br />Sections 4— 5; and approval of the GENERAL CONCEPT PUD, based on the comments and findings <br />outlined in Sections 4— 7 of the staff report, and conditions detailed in Section 8.0 of the staff report dated <br />March 4, 2009. <br />Mr. Lloyd noted that the applicant remained willing to work with staff on the height and design of the <br />screening fence between residential properties and this proposed commercial land use, in addition to <br />working with those residents. <br />� Discussion between Commissioners and staff included clarifying where the existing zoning standards and <br />� proposed conditions were inconsistent; subject parcels remaining two (2) separate parcels and not <br />� subdivided or replatted, since the structure would not be built over an existing property line; proposed ten <br />� foot (10') setback from the side parking lot line to the residential properties; and no concerns in not <br />� adhering to the forty foot (40') traffic visibility triangle for the building. <br />� City Engineer Debra Bloom <br />� Ms. Bloom reviewed staff's rationale in approving the proposed building location and setbacks, based on <br />� vehicle visibility and approaches, area speeds and posted speeds, with design consistent with a 35 mph <br />� street; and availability of the EVP signal at that intersection. <br />� Further discussion included accident potential at that intersection for vehicles not adhering to the traffic <br />� light; and concerns addressed by the Fire and Police Departments, with ongoing discussions to minimize <br />� potential accident issues. <br />� Additional discussion included standard versus proposed setbacks; consistent setback of the proposed <br />� building from adjacent business property line; rationale for building locations closer to the street to <br />� encourage more pedestrian-friendly access; and consistency with "Complete Streets" concepts, in <br />� addition to consistency with the City's Cornerstone Plan developed in the mid- to late-1990's for <br />� development and redevelopment at significant intersections such as this, primarily to make them more <br />� transit, pedestrian and bicycle friendly, and to frame public space in a way not accomplished with a <br />� parking lot, and allowing a more urban feel. <br />� Further discussion included the location of the main entrance to the building and the privacy concerns of <br />� the anticipated dental use, while allowing for future redesign of the entrance location; intent of the <br />� Neighborhood Business designation in the draft Comprehensive Plan in accommodating walkability, <br />� making pedestrian access from the street preferred; and removal of one (1) driveway onto County Road B <br />: from the current TCF property, with this land use. <br />: Additional discussion included main and emergency accesses into the building; building height of <br />: eighteen feet (18'), with decorative entry cap features facing the parking lot at twenty-one feet (21'); <br />screening of rooftop mechanicals; considerations for this land use in conjunction with the SuperAmerica <br />Page 1 of 6 <br />