My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0420_Packet_Exec
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0420_Packet_Exec
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 2:40:32 PM
Creation date
4/20/2009 8:54:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />Councilmember Pust expressed appreciation to the developer for their willingness to work on the <br />plan; and opined that the City Council should await those revisions, based on the concerns and <br />needed solutions. <br />Pust moved, Ihlan seconded, tabling consideration of this request. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Pust and Ihlan. <br />Nays: Johnson; Roe and Klausing. <br />Motion failed. <br />City Attorney Scott Anderson suggested that the City Council consider other options, such as <br />requesting that the developer return with a second General Concept Plan, addressing expressed <br />concerns. <br />�� Mayor Klausing opined his support for this plan, with some minor tweaking. <br />�� Roe moved, Klausing seconded, a motion to add a condition to the approval that the applicant <br />�� and staff work to address the safety triangle related to the corner of the building on Lexington <br />�� and County Road B; and to reduce the parking spaces as much as possible. <br />� c Roll Call <br />�� Ayes: Pust; Roe; and Klausing. <br />� c Nays: Johnson and Ihlan. <br />� � Motion carried. <br />�� Roll Call (original motion as amended) <br />� c Ayes: Roe, Klausing <br />� � Nays: Pust, Ihlan, Johnson <br />� � Motion Failed <br />� � City Attorney Anderson noted that the City Council had not approved the General Concept Plan <br />� � as presented; and that the City Council wished further revisions; and suggested extension of the <br />� � review deadline. <br />� � Klausing moved, Pust seconded, motion to authorize staff to send written notice to the applicant, <br />� � extending the sixty-day review deadline. <br />� � Roll Call <br />� � Ayes: Pust; Ihlan; Johnson; Roe; and Klausing. <br />� � Nays: None. <br />�� Councilmember Pust noted that the record clearly indicates her support for this project, with <br />�� proposed and minor revisions. <br />�� Mr. Wellington assured Councilmembers that this process and discussion had been productive, <br />�� and that they would continue their collaborative venture with staff and the neighborhood. Mr. <br />�� Wellington encouraged a workshop discussion with Councilmembers that could facilitate <br />�� improved designs and allow for broad community input reflecting those wishes. <br />�� Councilmember Johnson opined that this was a great proj ect; and he looked forward to resolution <br />�� of remaining issues. <br />�� Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of allowing time on a future agenda and non-voting <br />session for public input and Councilmember feedback on the project. <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.