Laserfiche WebLink
35000ga1 <br />incr) <br />40000ga1 <br />incr) <br />45000ga1 <br />incr) <br />50000ga1 <br />incr) <br />55000ga1 <br />incr) <br />$93.25 <br />$95.25 <br />$103.25 <br />$107.00 <br />$113.25 <br />$118.75 <br />$123.25 <br />$130.50 <br />$133.25 <br />$142.25 <br />($2.00 or 2o DEC) <br />($3.75 or 4o DEC) <br />($5.50 or 5o DEC) <br />($7.25 or 6o DEC) <br />($9.00 or 6o DEC) <br />$100.75 ($5.50 or 60 <br />$112.75 ($5.75 or 50 <br />$124.75 ($6.00 or 50 <br />$136.75 ($6.25 or 50 <br />$148.75 ($6.50 or 50 <br />Granted, if only 100-150 of users use more than 30,000 gallons per <br />quarter, only a relative few would be impacted by my suggested change. <br />However, out of fairness, they SHOULD have an increase, rather than a <br />decrease, between 2009 and 2008. <br />Also, as we move into future years, I would like to have more analysis <br />of applying a conservation rate structure to non-residential users, <br />since they should have incentives to conserve water as well. (Besides <br />the summer premium.) <br />Lastly, I would appreciate a staff analysis of how the language in the <br />statute dealing with multi-family housing rates is met by our <br />structure, or might have to be adjusted. I don't know whether our <br />multi-family buildings use single large meters that fall under non- <br />residential rates, or if there are small meters for each unit, based on <br />our terminology in the rate structure of "residential" versus "non- <br />residential." If they have large meters, do the equivalent block rates <br />work out in conformance with statute? <br />Please include this suggestion with the information that we consider at <br />our March 9th discussion of the conservation water rates. (Including <br />any staff analysis.) If the table in this email comes out garbled, let <br />me know and I can send a PDF or something. <br />Thanks, <br />Dan Roe <br />Roseville City Councilmember <br />Phone 651-487-9654 <br />Email dan.roe@comcast.net <br />