Laserfiche WebLink
Department Approval <br />� �.�,c� <br />�. <br />Item Description: <br />BACKGROUND <br />l�'�, <br />Jy <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Centennial Gardens Apartments Non-Compliance <br />Date: 3/09/2009 <br />Item No.: 12.a <br />City Manager Approval <br />� / <br />In June of 2007, the Roseville City Council authorized the issuance of t�-exempt bonds for Centennial <br />Gardens Apartments in the amount of $12M to Gardens East Limited Partnership in order to finance the <br />acquisition and renovation of the buildings. The t�-exempt bonds are considered "conduit financing" <br />and have no fiscal impact on the part of the City. As part of arrangement, Gardens East Limited <br />Partnership agreed to keep at least 20% of the units as affordable as defined by the State of Minnesota. <br />In August 2008, the City Council discussed concerns regarding rent increases and tenants not having <br />their leases renewed. In the fall of 2008, there were several letters from Jack Cann of the Housing <br />Preservation Project regarding the project's violation of state statutes governing the use of the tax- <br />exempt bonds. Specifically, Mr. Cann alleged that the project did not meet the minimum threshold for <br />providing affordable rents for at least 20% of the units since the developer failed to include utilities in <br />their calculation of rents when determining the fair market rent. <br />Upon review of Mr. Cann's assertions and in response to the City's inquiries, the developer's attorney <br />recognized a mistake was made in the calculations and that the project was not in compliance with state <br />statutes for a period of time. Subsequently, the developer reduced the rents to meet the affordability <br />guidelines. In addition, Gardens East Partnership identified 31 households that were overcharged in <br />rent and refunded a total of $1,687 to all of these parties. Although they were in compliance for the <br />month of June, Gardens East Limited Partnership also rebated residents for that month. The rebates <br />back to the individual tenants ranged from $10 -$180. <br />The partnership also attempted to reimburse those tenants that no longer lived at Centennial Gardens. <br />Of those that moved, they were able to reimburse 4 tenants. They were unsuccessful in locating three <br />former residents. However, they were able to reimburse a total of 28 households for overpayment of <br />rent. <br />In order to confirm the developer's assertations, staff has requested and reviewed information regarding <br />the rent charged to all of the units within the development from the time the bonds were issued (June <br />2007) to present to verify exactly when the project was not in compliance. The developer provided a <br />spreadsheet detailing the rent each unit was being charged for rent between June 2007 to the present. <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />