My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_0330
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_0330
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2009 1:57:07 PM
Creation date
4/30/2009 1:57:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/30/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 30, 2009 <br />Page 8 <br />12. Business Items (Action Items) <br />13. Business Items - Presentations/Discussions <br />a. Discuss Professional Services Policy <br />City Manager Malinen provided background material for a discussion of professional <br />services contract changes, to provide further direction to staff in drafting policy lan- <br />guage. <br />Councilmember Roe sought input from staff on professional services; whether the <br />same policy should apply to all professional services, or if there were differences in <br />providing those services that would indicate different policies; and how and when <br />best value contracting would be appropriate. <br />City Manager Malinen noted the appreciable amount of time staff expended in the <br />process, as indicated in the 2008 timeline/process for legal services contracts. Mr. <br />Malinen noted that fifty firms in the metropolitan area were invited to participate in <br />submitting a proposal for legal services, with the Request for Proposals (RFP) process <br />performed every three years; and staff's repeated requests of the City Council as to <br />whether to continue that process, or whether that process and term limits were valu- <br />able and in the City's best interests. Mr. Malinen opined that clearing up the current <br />protracted process, his lack of conviction in the value of term limits being in the <br />City's best interests, and balancing the value of the expertise of existing providers if <br />they remained competitively priced were all necessary steps in streamlining the proc- <br />ess. <br />Discussion included application of such a policy for City Attorney, City Prosecutor <br />and City'Auditors; possible statutory requirements for auditing services not being in- <br />dicated; primary concerns with the current policy being with term limits, with secon- <br />dary concerns being related to whom the policy applies; and how the City's Ethics <br />Code could apply to those firms and their individual commitment to that Code. <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that past Council action had specifically removed the <br />City Attorney from the scope of the Ethics Code. <br />City Manager Malinen opined that, of those three service providers (City Attorney, <br />Prosecuting Attorney and City Auditor), he would be open to Council directive re- <br />lated to the terms, to whom it applies, and the process indicated. Mr. Malinen noted <br />that the Auditor services are only for a small window of time; however, noted that the <br />City Attorney and City Prosecutor are involved in day-to-day operations of the City, <br />and have more connection with staff. Mr. Malinen sought City Council direction to <br />improve the process that has been followed for the last nine years; while noting the <br />statutory scheme for Plan B Cities in the process for the City Manager selecting the <br />City Attorney and City Prosecutor, with the City Council ratifying those selections. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.