Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June OS, 2009 <br />Page 17 <br />eral regulations, including HUD requirements; allowing the City to address any <br />non-compliance by AEON for its tenants. <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that City's experience with Centennial Commons and <br />applicable standards and responsibilities; and asked that the City Council ensure <br />that those provisions were stipulated and documented in the PUD Agreement. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that she was supportive of making a motion based on <br />discussion and assurances based on the record of tonight's meeting. <br />Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon noted that, at a future meet- <br />ing, aTax Increment Financing (TIF) Agreement would be coming forward to the <br />City Council; and suggested that it be more appropriate to address specific expec- <br />tations in that document, rather than in this Development Agreement. <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that the 60 day review deadline was not until June 30, <br />2009; and opined that the City needed to be consistent with all documents; and <br />that there was no reason to craft language from the dais at tonight's meeting, <br />when action could be delayed for further language refinement. <br />Acting Mayor Roe asked Mr. Rocker if there were other calendar or schedule re- <br />quirements for AEON that may be impacted by delay of tonight's requested ac- <br />tion. <br />Mr. Rocker responded affirmatively, that delay of tonight's requested action may <br />negatively impact their application to the State for final tax credits and possible <br />stimulus monies; based on application requirements for the project's status with <br />Building Permit review; and their need to move the project forward as soon as <br />possible. Mr. Rocker opined that he would prefer to see tonight's action specific <br />to land use decisions; and the other issues addressed as part of their upcoming re- <br />quest for TIF. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned the City's recourse should AEON not return <br />seeking TIF funding, if other funding sources should be found. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that there were no additional funding sources avail- <br />able; that TIF was required for Phase II of the project and an integral part of the <br />entire funding package. Councilmember Pust advised that, should AEON lose out <br />on housing finance monies during this funding round, they could lose out com- <br />pletely. Councilmember Pust suggested that the City Council proceed on to- <br />night's requested actions, based on the testimony received from the applicant to- <br />night, be incorporated and part of the Development Agreement. <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of such a condition of approval, allowing <br />for future wordsmithing by staff of the document. <br />