Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, May 18, 2009 <br />Page 23 <br />Councilmember Roe noted that this was a permitted use; and he recognized link- <br />age of the permitted use and the requested conditional use; however, he expressed <br />concern about where and how the City drew the line for additional notice; and <br />how the City could require more environmental review than those regulatory <br />agencies charged for monitoring this type of use. Councilmember Roe advised <br />that he had no problem tabling action tonight to allow for more specific informa- <br />tion. <br />Pust moved, Ihlan seconded, tabling action on this request until the regular Coun- <br />cil meeting scheduled for Monday, June 8, 2009, for the purpose of further re- <br />view. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Johnson; Ihlan; and Pust. <br />Nays: Roe. <br />Abstentions: Klausing. <br />Motion carried. <br />Councilmember Pust requested that staff provide addresses for the applicant's <br />other facilities in Minneapolis, Shakopee and Inver Grove Heights. <br />Mr. Kittleson advised that they would provide that information to staff; and of- <br />fered to coordinate guided tours of the plant through staff, based on the schedule <br />of operations at each specific plant. <br />Ihlan moved that the City Council direct staff to provide mailed notice of the June <br />8, 2009 meeting and this discussion to residents and businesses within a 1500 foot <br />radius. <br />The motion failed due to lack of a second. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed her frustration that the City Council would not <br />consider providing this additional notice of something so important to the com- <br />munity. <br />Mayor Klausing advised that he had no objection to notifying people; however, <br />suggested that that notice was available through broadcast of the Planning Com- <br />mission and City Council meeting, as well as word of mouth; and that those inter- <br />ested would be made aware of the issue. Mayor Klausing reiterated his concern <br />in government being so arbitrary as to keep shifting goals for notice areas. <br />Councilmember Roe opined that 1500' was arbitrary. <br />Pust moved, Johnson seconded, referring this issue to the City's Public Works, <br />Environment and Transportation Commission (PWET) for their analysis and input <br />at their meeting on May 26, 2009. <br />