Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 15, 2009 <br />Page 11 <br />Mr. Miller advised that staff had slated the June 29, 2009 regular business meet- <br />ing to have that broader discussion. <br />Mr. Miller advised that the requested action at tonight's meeting was consistent <br />with other Council action over several decades. <br />Johnson moved, Klausing seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 10716 entitled, <br />"Resolution Authorizing the Issuance, Sale and Delivery of the City of Roseville, <br />MN Senior Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Eaglecrest Project), Series 2009; <br />and Approving the Form of and Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of the <br />Bonds and Various Documents Relating Thereto." <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Johnson; Ihlan; Roe; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />b. Approve City Abatement for Unresolved Violations of City Code at 3076 <br />Woodbridge Street <br />Permit Coordinator Don Munson reviewed the request for abatement as detailed <br />in the staff report dated June 15, 2009; providing an update on the property as of <br />today consisting of personal items stored on the property in addition to numerous <br />unlicensed vehicles on the property for some time. <br />Mr. Munson reviewed ongoing discussions with Mr. Staff, the property owner; <br />ownership of three, now four unlicensed vehicles on the property belonging to the <br />property owners' sons, with repeated requests by Mr. Staff to his sons to remove <br />them to no avail. Mr. Munson noted that there were two double garages on the <br />property, and that staff had requested that the personal items on the property be <br />stored in those garages; however, no action had been taken to-date. <br />Mr. Munson noted that proposed abatement cost involved disposal of junk debris <br />estimated in the amount of $500; with no cost for impounding the four vehicles. <br />Discussion included costs to the vehicle owners for impounding and retrieval at <br />approximately $200-$250 per vehicle; staff's process to placard the vehicles with <br />a seven day notice prior to impounding them, with staff advising that the sons ap- <br />parently live at the property; and admission by the property owner that they did <br />not have money available to dispose of the junk and debris. <br />The property owner was not present at tonight's meeting. <br />Roe moved, Klausing seconded, directing staff to abate the public nuisance viola- <br />tion at 3076 Woodbridge, by hiring a general contractor to remove the junk/debris <br />and schedule. the impounding of the four vehicles; as detailed in the Request for <br />Council Action dated June 15, 2009, at an estimated cost of approximately $500; <br />and further directing that the property owner be billed for all actual and adminis- <br />