My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0511_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0511_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 2:43:33 PM
Creation date
7/28/2009 2:21:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Overview• <br />ArtMueller, a longtime Roseville resident and developer has proposed to purchase and develop the Weyer <br />property at 2025 West County Road B into an Active Senior Living Community'. This proposal was brought <br />forward March 4, 2009 before the Roseville Planning Commission for consideration. The Commission, after <br />consideration and debate respectfully approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning request to <br />allow for high density use. However, after much deliberation, voting to deny the General Concept PUD. As <br />with the previous proposal, the discussion / debate focused on items such as density, scale, and design <br />appearance. With respect and sensitivity to the neighborhood and the design process, we have again revised our <br />plan to address the neighborhood concerns, after discussion of the pending project with the Roseville Planning <br />Division. <br />The latest proposal features 55 (1, 2, & 3 bedroom) units with a variety of spacious floor plans, maintenance-free <br />quality exterior architectural materials, landscaping, an outdoor water feature, and underground parking. The <br />concept features a community room, game room, craft and exercise rooms, a kitchen, library, private dining, a <br />guest room, an office, mailroom, as well as many sitting areas. The project is designed for underground owner <br />parking spaces, and at-grade visitor parking spaces. <br />Siting and Design revisions of the building proposal include: <br />• A better defined covered entryway feature, greeting guests as they enter the building. <br />• Parking and access have been revised slightly and feature more parking close to the drop-off area, with a <br />continued water feature as the centerpiece. <br />• Retention Pond has been slightly modified in shape, but is still the same size and in the same location. <br />• The second garage access point has been eliminated at the Southeast end of the building. <br />• The northeast corner of the building has been adjusted and is now proposed at 45 degrees instead of a <br />straight 90 degree flat wall. This feature will soften and break up the wall expanse, and lessen the visual <br />impact from all properties on the east and the northeast sides of the property. <br />• The proposal now features various building jogs, which help to break up the perceived long expanse of <br />the building from all sides. This feature was a suggestion through discussion with the Architect and <br />Developer, as well as design suggestions from neighbors and Council Members. <br />• The southeast L-Wing of the building now jogs at an angle as it approaches County Road B. This will <br />also help to soften the impact from the adj acent road and give the building some additional character, <br />privacy, and curb appeal. The 3�d floor steps back 10 feet further from the property line than the lower <br />floors. At the NW corner the 3�d floor steps back one unit. <br />• The angled L-Wing feature along County Road B, will feature a small end cap roof to soften the <br />perceived height of the structure. The roof line has been lowered and some additional design features <br />added to give the appearance of a single-family structure at the south elevation. <br />• Both the north and east sides of the building have increased setbacks from the prior proposals. The north <br />setback varies between 21 feet and 369 feet, while the east setback varies between 30.5 feet and 51.7 <br />feetin distance. <br />• The exterior building materials are still proposed to be low maintenance, with some additional accent <br />features added to give the exterior more flair, and to better reflect a residential design-build type product. <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.