Laserfiche WebLink
Department Approval <br />� ���� � <br />Item Description <br />BACKGROUND <br />l�'�, <br />Jy <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 06/08/09 <br />Item No.: 12.c <br />City Manager Approval <br />� / <br />Consider a Resolution for the Imposition and Collection of Fees in the <br />Housing Improvement Area for Westwood Village I(HF0052) <br />On January 23, 2009, the City Council held a public hearing regarding the setting of assessment <br />amounts for the property owners within the Westwood Village I(WWVI) Housing Improvement Area. <br />The assessments were to fund exterior improvements of the WWVI buildings. After the public <br />hearing, the City Council adopted a fee resolution setting assessment amount for each property owner. <br />After the fee resolution for Westwood Village I(WWVI) was passed on January 23rd 2009, staff started <br />working on putting the financing in place for the improvements. Staff had a previous understanding <br />that the City of Roseville could directly place the loan for the HIA with Sremer Sank. Steve Subul the <br />HRA attorney was consulted regarding the HIA process that Roseville was undertaking for WWV I as <br />he has extensive experience with HIAs. Mr. Subul informed staff that the loan from Sremer is a <br />"bond" within the meaning of Section 428A.16. That is, the City would essentially issue a bond when <br />placing the loan with Sremer Sank, and used the proceeds to finance the housing improvements <br />described in the ordinance. The bond can be either secured solely by the housing improvement fees, <br />or also secured by the City's full faith and credit. Assuming the loan/bond is a general obligation, the <br />City must reasonably expect that the housing improvements fees will be sufficient to pay debt service-- <br />the city's t�ing power is pledged only as a back-up. <br />If the City wants to continue with financial assistance to WWVI without compromising cash reserves <br />earmarked for City programs, then the City will need to issue open-market bonds. The bonds must <br />meet all of the requirements of Minnesota statute, Chapter 475 (except no election is required and the <br />bonds do not count against the city's net debt limits). That just means that this transaction is not <br />handled like a commercial loan. Sond counsel would typically draft the documents, some of which <br />need to be filed with the county auditor. <br />Mr. Subul advised that the City must enter into a development agreement for the construction <br />improvements at WWVI. This development agreement requires that the WWVI be responsible for any <br />short falls that may occur from paybacks to the assessments after the bond has been issued. The fee <br />resolution that was passed on January 23rd, 2009 allowed for pay off of the assessments anytime after <br />issuances of the bonds. Staff did have Springsted look at what the financial probability of a shortfall <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />