My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0615_ Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0615_ Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 2:52:23 PM
Creation date
7/28/2009 2:44:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
concurred with Commissioner Cook regarding the net carbon footprint with locating the <br />plant in this central location. Commissioner Gottfried noted the lack of public comment <br />regarding this proposed use; and opined that the carbon dioxide impacts from traffic on <br />Highway 36 to residents adjacent on the south would probably have more danger. <br />Commissioner Gisselquist noted that he resided closest to the proposed plant; and noted <br />the background hum of traffic from Highway 36 on a continual basis. Commissioner <br />Gisselquist also noted the lack of neighbors present to comment; and further noted the <br />benefit of having a large industrial area far-removed from residential properties. <br />Commissioner Gisselquist spoke in support of the motion; opining that this was a good <br />use of the site to generate some revenue. <br />At the request of Commissioner Gottfried and for the record, Mr. Paschke verified that <br />the typical public hearing notice was provided; and verified that the application had <br />received a full staff review, including that of City Engineer Debra Bloom. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff was not as concerned with traffic generation from the site <br />as they were with wear and tear to the roadway; and noted that staff would have a <br />continuing dialogue with the applicant regarding this concern. Mr. Trudgeon advised <br />that, being in an industrial area, the roadway was constructed to higher standards than a <br />standard roadway. <br />Commissioner Best opined that this was a good use of the property; and spoke in support <br />of the motion and of this industrial use. Commissioner Best further opined that he was <br />not concerned with outdoor storage of materials and equipment, since this was an <br />industrial area. Commissioner Best also expressed his confidence that other monitoring <br />agencies provided sufficient environmental safeguards and regulations. <br />Commissioner Wozniak opined that this was our City, and what if those other agencies <br />didn't sufficiently monitor the environmental issues. <br />Commissioner Best opined that, until a zero emission asphalt plant was available, we still <br />needed roads to drive on. <br />Commissioner Wozniak suggested that cities needed to start saying "no," and provide <br />incentive for these companies to come up with new technologies. <br />Commissioner Best noted that this plant represented some of those new initiatives, such <br />as warm-mix versus hot-mix asphalt. <br />Ayes: 4 <br />Nays: 2 (Gottfried; Wozniak) <br />Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.