My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0615_ Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0615_ Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 2:52:23 PM
Creation date
7/28/2009 2:44:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Twin Lakes TIF District No. 17 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />June 9, 2009 <br />Definition of Substantial Renovation <br />Because "Substantial renovation" can mean different things to different people, LHB <br />has attempted to clarify exactly what we consider to be "substantial renovation" as it <br />relates to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(a) (1). <br />a. First we researched national standards as to how much building owners should <br />budget for annual maintenance and repair on their buildings as a percentage of <br />replacement cost of the building. <br />1. According to the University of California "Facilities Renewal Budget <br />Model " report of 1999, building owners should budget between two and three <br />percent of current replacement value of their buildings for maintenance and <br />repair work. This does not include routine janitorial work and routine items <br />such as changing light bulbs and filters. <br />2. According to the Building Research Board of the National Research Council, <br />one and one-half to three percent of a building's replacement value should be <br />budgeted for maintenance and repair. <br />b. Based on this information, LHB utilized two and one-half percent as the desired <br />amount of maintenance and repair that should be budgeted annually to keep a <br />building in good working condition. We recognize through experience that only a <br />small percentage of sophisticated building owners actually budget for and spend <br />this amount of money every year on maintenance and repair. This is because <br />most business owners are driven by other budgetary issues and tend to neglect the <br />building maintenance and repair line items in their annual budgets. <br />By establishing how much a building owner should be budgeting per year for <br />maintenance and repairs, LHB is of the opinion that we could more easily <br />establish an amount that would be considered "substantial" in comparison. If an <br />owner is budgeting 2.5 percent of the building's replacement cost annually, most <br />business owners or home owners would have to take out a loan to cover the cost <br />of a substantial building improvement. Assuming they had a fixed level of <br />income to work with, they would have to keep the loan payment at a level very <br />near the origina12.5 percent they should have been budgeting each year. In <br />addition, they still would have to budget for the origina12.5 percent on top of the <br />loan. In most cases, the mortgage terms would have to extend out to a point <br />beyond the life expectancy of the building they were trying to improve, as most <br />buildings built in the past fifty years are not designed to last beyond 40 years. <br />d. Based on the calculations described above, we have defined substantial <br />renovation for purposes ofMinnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision <br />10(a)(1), as renovation with costs exceeding 20% ofthe building's replacement <br />value. <br />Findings: <br />All 10 of the remaining buildings exceed the criteria required to be determined <br />substandard buildings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.