CC_Minutes_2009_0713 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, July 13, 2009 Page 21 high density provided the City with greater discretion and control, since medium density may or may not require a PUD. Mayor Klausing clarified that the City Council was not acting in haste regarding this proposal, since it had been under discussion and consideration since March of 2009, and had been before staff and Planning Commission for some time prior to that. Councilmember Ihlan opined that the comprehensive plan did not need to be amended tonight; and further opined that the comprehensive planning process should be community-based, not driven by developers. Councilmember Ihlan noted that the City Council had democratic authority to make plans for the overall best interest of the community; and opined that there remained much disceetion regarding how to proceed with rezoning beyond this particular project. [11.1] Klausing moved, Roe seconded, adoption of a Resolution entitled, "A Resolution Approving a Comprehensive Land Use Map Designation Amendment from Low Density Residential (LF) to High Density Residential (HR) at 2025 County Road B (PF-09-002)." Councilmember Roe opined that the real question, as apparent from the public comment consensus, was whether something more intense than single-family or low density was appropriate for this parcel; then what actual designation was most appropriate. Councilmember Roe noted the difficulty in making this decision; with medium density having a range of 5 -1 2 units per acre; and high density al- lowing for over 13 units per acre, while allowing the City more flexibility in what can be developed with high density designation, based on the flexibility of a PUD. Therefore, Councilmember Roe, spoke in support of comprehensive plan guid- ance to high density residential to allow the City more control and flexibility over potential development and the merits of specific proposals and public input during that process, rather than potential lack of control or medium density designation. Councilmember Ihlan opined that, if the project was turned down, it should be for the right reasons, and opined that it should be based on a policy discussion. Councilmember Ihlan further opined that the proposed high density project served to emphasize why it would be bad policy to change the comprehensive plan des- ignation to high density, based on the common sense nature of planning problems created. Councilmember Ihlan addressed access issues using Midland Grove Road and safety issues currently existing at the curve along that roadway, and only being compounded with this proposal; additional traffic in the immediate area with another 55-units as proposed, with this building identified by the devel- oper as a "small" high density building; excessive height, setback and impervious surface issues; diminishing green space; storm water drainage pressures on the system; and her perspective that planning policy indicates that this site is too small for high density use.