CC_Minutes_2009_0713 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

~.,~_ 9A ~.~'t^ NeAr~~~ , singtL Famtl or Y'ownhom~ 3~0 Ft ~~~ F~ 50 ~ l 3 0 ~~ ~ 0 0 Ff l00 ~, tg4 Ft ~.q 5 Ft ~ ~ ~ t yq Ft Lot Size Lot Size Impervious Units Units/Acre (acres) Req' Coverage Stories acres Sunrise 79 27.3 2.9 3.63 44% 3 Heritage 50 25 1.95 2.87 50% 3 above Place parking Accessible 22 26 8 .82 1 57% 3 Space Applewood 96 27.4 3.5 5.82 o 52 /o 3-4 above Pointe az,~ P g Greenhouse 102 26.6 4.5 6.15 54% 3 above Village parking arrons 42 33 1.27 2.39 58% 3 ~e Po d P g Applewood 96 28 3.4 6 51% 3 above Pointe II parking Ferriswood 47 3.92 12 N/A 41 % 1+ Townhomes vend 174 17 10.3 10.1 45% 3 kuie Gro P g Orchard 55 25 (21) 2.23 (2.61) 3.35 51% (44%) 3 above Paz'~g 3fi7 9.8 During the City Council meeting of May 1 1, the Council forwarded specific items for the ~~~ Planning Commission to consider; these include: s~~ a. Review of the appropriate impervious coverage calculations on the site; ~~.~, b. Review of the building's relative height based on sight lines and topography of v~ ; the site; 3?2 c. Review of actual scale perspectives relative to height issues from various angles ~~3 and giving consideration to roof slopes, number of stories, etc.; 4~4 d. Review whether sufficient improvements have been made with respect to distances 3?0' from adjacent properties based on setback requirements and perspectives frrom 30~ adjacent properties; 3S7 e. Review of the safety of access points and traffic issues on Midland Grove Road, ~w3 not only based on number of vehicles, but more specifically density of the area 3~s and design of the road; and connections to various and major intersections in ~c~ that area (i. e., County Road B at Midland Grove Road). ~:~ 9.9 The Roseville City Code does not include an impervious coverage requirement for any 402 zoning district other than R-1 and R-2 properties, so it is difficult for the Planning 4~~ Division to comment on whether the proposal includes too much impervious coverage - ^:~ especially since the Rice Creek Watershed and City Code require storm water 4u5 management be provided that address water quality and volume/rate of run-off: It is 4u0 worth noting that most of the projects analyzed above all have a similar impervious ~~7 coverage, generally above 50%. The Planning Division has concluded that there is no 4crs rationale for determining appropriate impervious coverage when the City does not have a 40? policy. PF09-002 RCA 071309.doc Pace 11 of 17