CC_Minutes_2009_0720 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, July 20, 2009 Page 16 ognizing the need for an intermediate category and how to deal with repeat viola- tions. Further discussion included the need to consider rationale for possible non- renewal of a liquor license; punitive versus substantive action to disqualify reap- plication for a license; and the need to provide a clear message to the public and businesses that the City takes very seriously, as a privilege, for a business to hold a liquor license; that it doesn't condone sales to minors; and that there should be no incidents occurring if proper training is provided and monitored for employees. After further discussion, it was Council consensus that Councilmembers Roe and Pust serve as a Council Subcommittee with staff to redraft the liquor ordinance to bring back to the full body for review and consideration. 14. City Manager Future Agenda Review City Manager Malinen provided projected. agenda items for future meeting. 15. Councilmember-Initiated Items for Future Meetings Councilmember Pust requested two items, based on discussions at last week's Council meeting, both related to the proposed Orchard Project: ^ Zoning Code language specific to impervious surface limits and which districts to which they applied; with staff interpreting the code that it only applied to R-1 and R-2 Districts; and Councilmember Ihlan interpreting code that it applied to all residential districts (i.e., Ordinance 1001.01, subpart A.6); and whether a clarifi- cation needed to be provided as part of pending Zoning Code revisions for com- pliance with the amended Comprehensive Plan. ^ The issue raised by Attorney Peter Coyle during that same discussion as to the unique process of Roseville in handling PUD requests and tying potential Com- prehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments to Concept versus Final Concept Plans; research on what other cities do; and a recommendation from staff on fu- ture processes to assure that the City Council retains the most leverage possible for its citizens in granting rezoning; and whether any changes in the process need to be part of the pending Zoning Code revisions for• compliance with the amended Comprehensive Plan. 16. Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:10 p.m.