Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 20, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br />11. Public Hearings <br />12. Business Items (Action Items) <br />a. Approve City Abatement for Code Violations at 3065 Sandy Hook Drive <br />Permit Coordinator Munson reviewed the request for abatement as detailed in the <br />staff report dated July 20, 2009; providing a visual update on the property as of <br />today of this single-family property, with a building permit previously issued for <br />remodeling the home; but currently all work having ceased and the property for <br />sale. Mr. Munson advised that the home is tentatively sold with the prospective <br />buyer intending to finish the project, but no guarantee to-date that the sale will be <br />finalized. Mr. Munson suggested short-term abatement costs are estimated at <br />$25,000. <br />Staff recommended that the Community Development Department be authorized <br />to abate the public nuisance violations at 3065 Sandy Hook Drive if repairs to the <br />home are not substantially completed by September 15, 2009. <br />Public Comment <br />Mark Larson, neighbor at 3020 Sandy Hook Drive <br />Mr. Larson expressed his substantial concerns with the proposed abatement, opin- <br />ing that it would be "putting a band aid on a major wound." Mr. Larson alleged <br />that there were additional interior structural issues not readily seen from exterior <br />photos. Mr. Larson noted when the home had been occupied, its sump pumps <br />were continually operating, which could be attributed to where the home had been <br />constructed on the shores of Lake Owasso, too close to the lake with improper <br />grading. Mr. Larson advised that other adjoining neighbors shared these con- <br />cerns; and asked that the City Council delay any abatement action on this property <br />to determine if a sale of the home to a responsible developer or someone inter- <br />ested in a long-range solution to a serious problem came to fruition, or the indi- <br />vidual currently controlling the property took action to complete renovations. Mr. <br />Larson opined that this person, Mr. Larry Lee, was a sophisticated business man <br />active in the real estate field, and knew he was sitting on this asset. Mr. Larson <br />advised that he and other neighbors had toured the home with a realtor since it <br />had been vacated, and there appeared to be a mold issue in the home. <br />Discussion among Councilmembers, staff and Mr. Larson included rationale in <br />the City stalling completion of the exterior renovations that would only further <br />degrade interior issues; benefits to the neighborhood with delayed or immediate <br />action; delaying action to provide incentive to any purchaser of the property as <br />part of their liability rather than using public dollars; confirmation that Mr. Larson <br />himself was not a prospective purchaser of the home; offers to-date on the prop- <br />erty; and status of the construction of the dormer. <br />