My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0810_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0810_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 3:04:13 PM
Creation date
8/7/2009 9:19:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Attorney Anderson advised that his firm would work on the confidentiality concerns <br />as discussed; noting that the most common privacy issue was personnel and/or discipline <br />issues; and those would be the only practical things requiring a standard disclaimer. <br />Councilmember Roe concurred that this statement was overused. Councilmember Roe <br />referred to a recent presentation at Roseville University related to City Policy <br />development on Data Practices and Record Retention that may serve to help clarify the <br />questions and concerns expressed by Councilmember Pust. <br />Councilmember Roe noted the need to clarify language on Page 2, lines 8— 13, related to <br />distribution to all City Councilmembers or only a quorum. <br />City Attorney Anderson noted that this language was word for word from the Open <br />Meeting Law. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that this policy was designed to distinguish communication, not <br />pending City Council action, going to all Councilmembers. <br />City Attorney Anderson clarified the need to remind staff that anything specific to an <br />agenda item needed to be included in the agenda packet and provided to the public, <br />unless falling within City Attorney/client privilege. City Attorney Anderson further <br />clarified that, if a member of the public sent each Councilmember communication, there <br />was no requirement in law to provide a public copy of those member materials; only <br />those items prepared and/or distributed at the direction of the governing body or its <br />employees; but that something coming to the City Council from a citizen was not within <br />the provision of law needing to be included in the packet materials. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that, beyond the statute, but from a policy standpoint to provide <br />for transparency in government and in the spirit of the law, it may be prudent to include <br />that information. <br />City Attorney Anderson noted that there was nothing prohibiting the City Council from <br />going further than the law required if they so chose that as their policy. <br />City Attorney Anderson advised that he would take tonight's comments and discussion <br />into consideration for changing this first draft, as well as further researching First <br />Amendment laws. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.