My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0817_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0817_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 3:07:03 PM
Creation date
8/20/2009 4:01:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
approval locating this new lot line within 50 feet of where it is shown on the <br />�� . PxELiMiNAxY PLAT, corresponding to the western end of the Phase I building. <br />11 6.7 While the Phase II landscape plan will be the same as the 2008-approved plan, a Phase I <br />11 landscape plan will need to address the area that would become the future Phase II <br />11 building and parking lot. Similarly, new Phase I grading, building elevations, and floor <br />11 plans will be necessary as part of the PUD AMENDMENT and the previously-approved <br />11 plans can serve as the Phase II plans. <br />�� 6.8 Roseville's Fire Marshal recommends requiring the construction of a second entrance <br />�� from the new "Langton Lake Drive" to the western end of parking area during Phase I to <br />�� improve the access for fire apparatus and other emergency response vehicles. This access <br />�� may be in the location identified for the full development/Phase II or in a location <br />�� specific to Phase I and must be approved by the Fire Marshal. <br />�� 6.9 The Suilding Official has identified some concerns with the proposed phasing, but all of <br />�� them can be addressed; the following Suilding Code concerns will be addressed through <br />�� the building permit review process and need not be specifically addressed by land use <br />� � approvals: <br />�� a. Suilding Code requirements typically mandate certain property line setbacks, but <br />�: heightened construction standards and/or covenants to restrict and define the <br />�: developments on the two lots can resolve potential conflict with the Suilding <br />�: Code created by the proposed zero-foot setbacks from the interior lot line; <br />�: b. United Properties will need to be sure that neither Phase I nor Phase II will create <br />�: dead-end corridors within the structure; and <br />�: c. Although the applicant may receive the necessary zoning approvals through the <br />�: PUD AMENDMENT process, none of the plans provided for this process will have <br />�: been reviewed against Suilding Code requirements. For this reason, both phases <br />�: of construction will require building plans that meet the concurrent Suilding Code <br />� : standards. <br />�� 6.10 Engineering Division staff recommends requiring implementation of the full, previously- <br />�� approved drainage, storm water mitigation, and utility plans with Phase I of the project in <br />�� order to ensure adequate protection of the nearby wetland. <br />1 � 7.0 PUBLIC HEARING <br />�� The duly-noticed public hearing for this application was held by the Planning <br />�� Commission on August 5, 2009. Two members of the public were in attendance with <br />�� comments or questions about the proposal; draft minutes of the public hearing are <br />�� included with this report as Attachment I and some of the parts of the discussion are <br />�� summarized in the following sections. <br />�� 7.1 A representative of the owner of the industrial properties through which the parking lot <br />� 4 for Langton Lake Park is currently accessed spoke in support of the application and <br />� 4 indicated that the current park access is not as informal an arrangement as City staff has <br />� 4 come to understand it to be, but that the access is actually secured by an easement. <br />� 7.2 A resident from the neighborhood to the north of the subject property asked a few <br />questions about the project and the proposed amendment, and upon learning the answers <br />PF07-006 RCA 081709.doc <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.